1 | 5 min | Welcome | - Welcome
- Thank you to meeting note-taker
- Departing and new members
| Kristi Park |
2 | 15 min | DSpace Development Report | Update on the current status of DSpace 7 development - Reminder of how we got here (See "Milestones" in DSpace Release 7.0 Status)
- DSpace releases (Project Boards on GitHub)
- & Prioritization of 7.x features
- 7.1 Release Status (Due Nov 1)
- Numerous Bug fixes, accessibility fixes & other minor improvements
- 7 likely new features (4.5 community-contributed, 2.5 funded)
- Item Versioning (high priority, funded)
- Collection Harvesting via OAI-PMH (high priority, funded)
- Request a Copy (high priority, 1/2 funded, 1/2 community-contributed)
- Import Entities via Simple Archive Format (SAF) (medium-low priority, community-contributed)
- Import OpenAIRE funders as Entities (unranked, community-contributed)
- IIIF Support (unranked, community-contributed)
- Simplify creating Entity using Collections for each Entity Type (unranked, port from DSpace-CRIS, mostly community-contributed
Post 7.0 development (Prioritization of features
| Tim Donohue
|
3 | 5 min | DSpace Community Advisory Team report | - Update on DCAT activities
| Maureen Walsh |
4 | 5 min | Working and Interest Group Reports | Brief updates/Q&A from Working and Interest Group representatives. GROUP | REPORT |
---|
Governance Working Group (wiki link) | View file |
---|
name | GovernanceWG-report-October 2021.pdf |
---|
height | 250 |
---|
|
| Product Visioning Working Group (wiki link) | View file |
---|
name | dsapce-product-visioning-wg-update-2021-10-13.docx |
---|
height | 250 |
---|
|
| Marketing Interest Group (wiki link) |
|
| Kristi Park (chair, Governance Working Group) Scott Hanrath (chair, Product Visioning Working Group) Jenn Bielewski (chair, Marketing Interest Group) |
5 | 15 min | Financial and Fundraising Report
| - Financial report (FY2021 and August 2021 reports shared in email)
End of FY20-21 Overall: Performed slightly better than budgeted - Budgeted for $ 12k investment; actual $ 8k
- Overall net assets: $ 16,396
Summary of 7.0 Paid Development Costs - $ 317,427 overall 7.0 development (Beta 1-5 and 7.0); over 2 fiscal years
- $ 163,227 fund-raised (over 2 fiscal years)
Notes - $ 8,299 in net assets as of Aug 31
- Not yet using LYRASIS line of credit
| Laurie Arp, Kristi Park |
6 | 15 min | Elections process and timeline | - Report on process and timeline of Leadership election
- Report on process and timeline of Steering Group and Chair elections
- Reference: DSpace Leadership Group
- Open positions to be considered in the new year
- 28 Bronze members = elections for 3 seats (1 seat for every 8 )
- 12 Silver members = elections for 3 (1 seat for every 4)
- 10 Gold = all have seats in governance
- 3 Platinum = all have seats in governance
- 2 community-at-large seats for DSpace Community participants (non-members)
- Other ex officio participants
| Michele Mennielli |
7 | 50 min | DSpace Value Proposition | Discuss and gather feedback from Leaders on the value proposition for DSpace, as a means to seed discussion and work by the Membership Engagement Group and related groups in our efforts to recruit new users and members. Leaders will break into 4 randomly assigned groups. We will take 25 minutes for breakout discussions and then return for 20 minutes to report out and discuss with the whole group. Guide for breakout discussions: - Record group members in the notes document.
- Identify reporter to report highlights of the discussion out to the larger group.
- Each group will discuss the following topics/questions and report back to the full group:
- What is the DSpace value proposition for your institution? What are the most important reasons your institution uses DSpace?
- Which parts of the value proposition do you think are most unique to DSpace (versus true of all repository platforms)?
- What do you think would be the most compelling arguments for DSpace membership targeted at (a) library administrators (b) repository managers (c) software developers / technology folks or (d) other audiences?
- Who at your institution makes decisions about (a) which platforms to use and (b) where to devote financial resources to for support of open source/open access?
Breakout #1 notes Breakout #2 notes Breakout #3 notes Breakout #4 notes | Kristi Park, all |
9 | 5 min | Any other business, as time allows |
|
|