Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • keep it simple – have all the tools we need, but not multiples
  • characteristics
    • name | URI/locator | purpose sentence | date information (date recorded; last updated) | owner/stakeholder/stewardship | public/private
      • if we don't know the steward that's a red flag
      • if private, logins required– move toward single sign-on with VIVO account that can be passed from person to person
    • do we want a category?
    • assign a status and/or recommendation
      • archive, update, or current, with a reason for recommendation

Wiki – for communication within the project

  • there's the main wiki space, then a set of other spaces
  • pages in the wiki are not assets – too much detail

vivoweb.org – for communication beyond the project and for outright newcomers

  • is the blog a separate asset? inclined to think of vivoweb.org as one asset that is managed as a communications tools

conference-related assets

  • probably has several parts
    • mailing list/CRM
    • archive of presentations (presently on vivoweb.org)
    • website
    • mobile app
    • sponsor materials
    • photos
  • sometimes these overlap VIVO project assets – e.g., a list of prospects

things we think we are not using

  • vivo.ideascale.com
  • sourceforge wiki (no longer linked from the vivo.sf.net landing page)

things we have too many of but still need

  • a CRM that all project staff can contribute to
  • lists of VIVO sites
    • vivo.vivoweb.org
    • a list in the wiki

things we think we need and don't have

 

Action items

  •