Upcoming Topics:(Let us know if there are topics you want to discuss in future weeks)
DSpace accepts external identifiers (DOIs and such) from submitters, and manages others (DOIs again, Handles) itself. Should these be stored in separate metadata fields? what fields? what schema? Various bits of DSpace have disagreed on the answers. See also https://github.com/DSpace/DSpace/pull/1006.
Discussion/proposal around refactoring and simplifying Live Import and External Data frameworks: https://github.com/DSpace/DSpace/issues/9758 (nothing concrete yet but would be great to get thoughts added to this issue and maybe find some collaborators)
To quickly find PRs assigned to you for review, visit https://github.com/pulls/review-requested (This is also available in the GitHub header under "Pull Requests → Review Requests")
Early brainstorms at DSpace Release 9.0 Status. Please feel free to add your own brainstorms or link in tickets that you wish to be considered.
Goals for 8.1 / 7.6.3
Deadline is TBD for both 8.1 and 7.6.3. Bug fix releases do not have fixed/scheduled deadlines.Instead, the developer team will determine when to create a release based on the significance of the issues to solve. (e.g. If major issues are fixed, then a bug fix release will occur more rapidly. If minor issues are found, then a bug fix release may be delayed until sufficient fixes have been made to warrant a release)
Bug/security fixes only. These minor releases will not include any new features.
New "themeable components" (for dspace-angular) are allowed in bug fix releases, provided that they don't significantly modify component behavior or similar.
Accessibility fixes are also allowed in bug fix releases, provided they don't significantly modify component behavior or similar.
Bug fix PRsshould be created against "main" branch where possible. The "main" branch has the most strict code style rules. (i.e. PRs created against dspace-7_x are becoming more difficult to port forward.)
Per our support policy, bug fixes are only guaranteed to be ported back to 8.x. That said, where possible, we'll try to backport bug fixes (especially significant ones) to 7.6.x.
Keep in mind, if a specific bug fix is important to you in 7.6.x, then it is best to create two PRs (one for main and one for "dspace-7_x"). If you are able to provide a backport version of the PR, then we will merge it alongside the "main" branch version.
NOTE: In many scenarios, a backport to "dspace-8_x" should be possible to automate using the "port to [branch]" labels & the "Port merged Pull Request" GitHub Action
Try "Pull Request Trading" for a quicker review
Do you have a PR stuck in "under review" that you really want to see move forward? Or maybe it's someone else's PR but you want to get it more attention?
Holger and Tim will attend the NA User Group Meeting in Minneapolis from Sept. 23-25. This does not impact the regular meeting schedule of the weekly dev meetings
Any agenda items for next week should be added by developers
DSpace 9.0 release
No updates; upcoming Leadership meeting on October 2, where a final decision on 9.0 prioritization will be made
In the meantime, we are working under the tentative assumption that prioritization will include items on the DSpace Release 9.0 Status page
Giuseppe Digilio (4Science) will add a comment or create additional ticket/PR to discuss if we want to implement a check for duplicate tags in the json5 files.
Migrate cookie consent from Klaro to Orejime (#3199)
Need to figure out if mandatory cookies need user consent according to GDPR compliance and if we need to display these (per pop-up) to users
We believe the approach Orejime uses seems to be GDPR compliant. We believe the cookie popup does not need to be displayed if all cookies are mandatory.
Pascal-Nicolas Becker noted that we may need to investigate DSpace's Solr Statistics to see if we need to add it to the cookie popup as an option to enable/disable (similar to Google Analytics).
Pascal-Nicolas Becker also noted that the CORRELATION_ID used in the REST API may need to be investigated further. If it can be linked back to a user's account, then it could be a way to track user activities in the log. We need to determine if this is GDPR compliant, and whether it needs to be possible to opt out or disable it in some way.
Need to create tickets to investigate both of these further (Pascal-Nicolas Becker will create ticket, link it back to this PR)
Possibility of asking Steering for a small fund to address legal implications through a lawyer
Reorder buttons in Submission forms are not keyboard accessible (#1271)
Overall agree that this is a good fix, need to make sure that the maximum is configurable, allowing it to set to 0 as well, in order to avoid hitting an infinite loop