Date
Attendees
Goals
- Review, next steps
Discussion items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 min | Review current list | All | How to complete missing items on rows? Questions regarding definitions? |
| 10 min | Next steps – topics | All | Major topic areas – conference, duraspace, development, outreach, other? |
| 10 min | Next steps – interviewees and assignments | All | Who needs to be interviewed? Who will interview? |
| 10 min | Next steps – sharing the list for comment | All | When, how, who? |
| 10 min | Next meeting | All | When do we meet again? What do we need to have accomplished |
Notes
Good to have suggested assets
Should we have relationships among assets? Or just partition with labels/columns
- two distinct concepts – what kind of thing is it physically vs. what kind of activity is it supporting – the conference, community building
- the latter can facilitate clumping – e.g., everything having to do with implementation
- should we color code the assets?
- ones to chop?
- have to decide how to handle the recommendation
A lot of them, but incomplete
- two kinds of incompleteness – partially filled out rows and missing rows
- how far out should we go – are VIVO search and VIVO searchlight enough under our jurisdiction?
- put them on the suggested access list – they should be part of the community but are still only one-person projects
- this is an issue for the contributed initiatives task force will have to deal with – things you don't just want to be loose in the wild
