Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. VIVO-1528: It's true that VIVO bases most editing based on the type of the property. But for strings it's not clear which should be HTML edited, which not. At least 3 different solutions:
    1. Configuration property for deciding which editor should be applied
    2. Use data type for decision which editor should be used
    3. Application decides based on context, like most application do. That puts domain language knowledge in the templates
    Please comment on the JIRA ticket linked above.
    Violeta & Mike: We should reduce the use of the HTML/WYSIWYG editor anyway.
    To do: Where in a common/popular ontology is the data range of the DOI declared as URL (data type restriction = URL). Fallback solution: URI. Christian Hauschke
    Then there should be a PR for the bibontology.  [http://bibliographic-ontology.org/ AND https://github.com/structureddynamics/Bibliographic-Ontology-BIBO
    Look into schema.org and how they define identifiers: https://schema.org/identifier ]
    Christian: Proposing an identifier ontology
    Mike: Maybe at Pidapalooza 2019
  2. Brian's session at the VIVO conference 2018 regarding the askupdated.sparql (https://github.com/search?q=org%3Avivo-project+askupdated.sparql&type=Code). We could start with ontology releases (with semantic versioning. which has its downsides).
  3. Clear process for ontology additions/changes:
    1. Make a local ontology
    2. If there's something that could be intersting to the VIVO community in general: Open up an issue in https://github.com/openrif/vivo-isf-ontology/

...