Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Current »

Notes from committer call 10-Nov-2004 (11-Nov-2004 Aus)

Jim, Richard J, Gabriela, Scott, Richard R, Ralph, Rob

DSpace 1.2.1

Permissions bug seems the only showstopper.
1.2.1 beta 2 by the end of this week, 1.2.1 next week with a fix for the
permissions bug
Jim has managed to get crond compiling docs each night (how to access?)

Potential multi-repository change to DSpace 1.x

Don't need separate Tomcat instances – .war's just fine
Richard J has 3 instances running just fine
Gabriela has 2 instances running using 2 Tomcat instances
Richard R: Need more details, test to do with memory consumption
Jim: Would be good to have this done in a 2.0 context

  • Rob to reply, suggesting some experiments to see if that will work until 2.0

DSpace+2.0 process

People happy with the approach lined out in email 'DSpace+2.0 process

Ralph: Need to flesh out infrastructure more. E.g. Cocoon as container

  • more details about requirements and how that would work, so we can
    make a decision

Jim: Should decide which standards and what tiers first, then we can
decide on tools. Consider how people are going to want to build
applications? DSpace an application vs a toolkit FEDORA-style?

Scott: Interested to look at some of the FEDORA work – they have a
form of AIP in there

Ralph: Would be good to approach FEDORA people about that, but need
some clear requirements

  • Richard volunteers to have a look at FEDORA, particularly the storage side, and put together a high-level set of requirements to get the ball rolling

Rob: have some good ideas, not sure if they've been communicated via
docs and email effectively, hence prototype

Discussion about framework/toolkit approach vs application. Consensus
we definitely need to maintain the 'works out of the box' aspect of
DSpace. Proposal to accumulate requirements so that we can be sure that
a base DSpace+2.0 fulfills our basic requirements.

  • Rob to set up a page so that each of us can put down the requirements/features/use cases that we find essential in our Dspaces

Discussion of some of the basic areas:

  • Generalised workflow component (Ralph interested)
  • Standard remote API interfaces get built on top of
  • Extensible APIs?
  • Internationalisation
  • Information model (FEDORA relevant)

Ralph: Should look at IMS digital repo definitions (reference?)

Work over next few months

Jim: Hoping to start a second asset store prototype

Ralph: Thinking about versioning – how CVS (or subversion or ARCH)
could work as an asset store

Scott: Interested in looking at providing ingest services

  • No labels