You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 9
Next »
Agenda & Notes
- Pure now has a SPARQL API that is compliant to the VIVO Ontology 1.6: https://helpcenter.pure.elsevier.com/en_US/release-notes-pure-520-4210/release-notes-pure-520-4210
- "Support for VIVO has been added to Pure as part of the Administrative module. When enabled this will provide you with a VIVO 1.6 compliant SPARQL endpoint to query as well as a test page in the Pure Experts Portal"
- Review of pull requests:
- Ontology release management
- Open Access Ontology
- https://github.com/tawahle/oa-ontology
- In Germany, all institutions from the Leibniz Association must submit an annual report on publications published in Open Access and its subtypes; ther German institutions needs the information about Open Access publications for variuos reports too - a need to cover this informatioin in VIVO.
- OA types align to the Unpaywall oa_status (Data Format | Unpaywall)
- Questions - could be there any implications because of:
- access types assigned additionally to skos:Concept
- vivo-oa:Open_Access_General has additionally skos:broader relation to vivo-oa:Open_Access_Diamond, vivo-oa:Open_Access_Green, vivo-oa:Open_Access_Gold, vivo-oa:Open_Access_Bronze, vivo-oa:Open_Access_Hybrid ?
- For now there are links to Open Access in Wikidata, Agrovoc and COAR (Controlled Vocabularies for Repositories: open access (coar-repositories.org)) via rdfs:seeAlso. Does it make sense to make the links via owl:sameAs?
- What is missing in the ontology?
- bibo:doi
Ideas for future meetings
- Improvement of VIVO sample data
To Do
- Enter tasks here, use "@" to assign a user, and "//", to add a deadline.