Contribute to the DSpace Development Fund
The newly established DSpace Development Fund supports the development of new features prioritized by DSpace Governance. For a list of planned features see the fund wiki page.
Date
from 14:00-15:00 UTC
Location: https://lyrasis.zoom.us/my/dspace (Meeting ID: 502 527 3040).
- More connection options available at DSpace Meeting Room
Beta 4 Sprint : July 13-24
- Beta 4 active development
- DSpace 7 Project Boards
- View PRs assigned to you for review/testing: https://github.com/pulls/review-requested
Agenda
(BEFORE MEETING IN #dev-sprint) Developer Stand Up - Developers give brief updates on their effort (or their team's effort).
- Update/see "Current Work" section below based on your status. Please feel free to update prior to meeting.
- Please highlight any new work (needing reviews/testing), any blockers (for you), and any discussion topics you may have.
- (20 mins) General Discussion Topics
- Curation Tasks may need more discussion. A few flaws in current design
- REST PR: Output/Results is not being provided to the REST API. This is different from DSpace 6 behavior.
- Repeats this security issue in REST API: https://github.com/DSpace/DSpace/issues/2822 We need to avoid allowing some CLI flags on REST API (e.g. `--eperson`) for all scripts.
- Angular PR: Currently in UI, tasks are runnable in two places...from the Curation Tasks page (which is easier to use) and from Processes UI. Is there a way to hide them from the latter?
- REST PR: Output/Results is not being provided to the REST API. This is different from DSpace 6 behavior.
- OTHER TOPICS WELCOME: Send them before end of day on Tuesday, July 21
- Curation Tasks may need more discussion. A few flaws in current design
- (30 mins) Planning for next week
- Review of our Beta 4 Project Board
Attendees
- Giuseppe Digilio (4Science)
- Ben Bosman - On holiday week of July 20-24
- Paulo Graça
- Heather Greer Klein
7.0 Release Goals
These resources define the prioritization and general schedule we are working towards
- DSpace 7 Release Goals : overview of goals/timelines & beta release process
- DSpace 7 Release Plan spreadsheet: our planning spreadsheet which details which features are scheduled for each Beta release.
Current Work
Project Board
DSpace 7.0 Beta 4 Project Board: https://github.com/orgs/DSpace/projects/3
To quickly find PRs assigned to you for review, visit https://github.com/pulls/review-requested (This is also available in the GitHub header under "Pull Requests → Review Requests"
Delayed / Needs Discussion
- Finalize / approve the initial list of all authorization features which we should implement for the /api/authz/features REST endpoint. This list of features should be limited to only features which are required to enable/disable User Interface functionality. (In other words, we can always add more features in the future. We just need to approve the list necessary for 7.0)
- Review current spreadsheet (from Andrea Bollini (4Science) ) : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1182LcD_WqIZRbUGWpLtBw0aOMR9jhbOVB7GZqtTpR9A/edit?usp=sharing
- Art Lowel (Atmire) : I don't see any immediate issues with the current set of features, but I would prefer a consistent naming scheme. I'd use canDoSomething for everything
- Tim Donohue added possible renames of these features based on Art's idea (see cell comments in spreadsheet). I like the "can[DoSomething]" naming scheme as well.
- Review current spreadsheet (from Andrea Bollini (4Science) ) : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1182LcD_WqIZRbUGWpLtBw0aOMR9jhbOVB7GZqtTpR9A/edit?usp=sharing
- Initial Performance Testing from Chris. Needs revisiting / retesting prior to 7.0.
- https://cwilper.github.io/dspace-perftest/
- These performance tests were run prior to the work on "projections" (to limit the data returned by the REST API). Therefore, it is likely performance is much improved, but needs verification testing.
- (REST Contract) Edit Homepage News: https://github.com/DSpace/Rest7Contract/pull/45
- Delayed. General agreement (in meeting on March 21, 2019) that storing HTML in metadata fields is not really ideal behavior. Metadata (from a librarian standpoint) tends to be free of format-related markup (as that allows for easier sharing, understanding of metadata. Currently Community & Collection homepage information is HTML-based and is stored in metadata that is appropriate for a minor subset of information (like the title) but it is better to move large/rich text to bitstreams.
- Proposal here is to consider storing HTML-based markup (for Site, Community & Collection homepages) in Bitstream(s) associated with the object in question. May allow for more CMS-lite behavior in the future
- Timeline for this is uncertain. Possibly in 7 or 8. May depend on how/whether it can be scoped.