You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

Date

Attendees

Goals

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes

announcements


Proposed: suppress '?' inflection (let it be optional), leaving just the '??' inflection

  • as before, '??' requests kernel elements plus any persistence statement
  • '??' easier to implement than '?'
  • '?' may be supported by older implementations (briefer record)
  •    ... or should '?' be made identical to '??'  ?



are we ready for next review phase with arks-forum?

Action items

  •  
  • No labels