You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

At the request of the DSpace Committers and Developers, the DSpace Community Advisory Team\ (DCAT) has begun an effort to build a community consensus on improving the metadata support in future DSpace releases. Last month this process began with a community survey to collect feedback on what improvements organizations would like to see relative to metadata support in DSpace.

Survey Result Highlights

* 84% of respondents use DSpace or plan to use DSpace

* Top 5 metadata schemas to include in DSpace, in order of priority: Dublin Core, MODS, PREMIS, Open URL ContextObject, ETD-MS

*72% it is a priority to add metadata authority controls/vocabularies to the data model

*62% it is a priority to have enhanced metadata for Communities, Collections and/or individual Files (bitstreams)

*56% it is a priority to update to update the Qualified Dublin Core registry to the lastest standards of the DCMI

*54% would not have objections to prohibiting changes/deletions that would break compliance with the standardized default Dublin Core metadata schema

 The complete survey results are available here: INSERT LINK

Where do we go from here?

From the survey it is clear that there are improvements to metadata support in DSpace that could help solve some common challenges for many organizations. Many will agree that there is no one size fits all repository software. DSpace is the most popular repository software, used by over 1000 organizations for a reason – it is relatively easy to get a repository up and running. If we are to add more complexity/flexibility to DSpace we need to be careful that it is not at the cost of making it more difficult for the vast majority of DSpace use cases. In addition, there are existing software solutions that provide for the ultimate in flexibility, namely Fedora. With that in mind, DCAT has proposed exploring the following priorities with the DSpace Committers/Developers and the user community:

1)    Adding metadata authority controls/vocabularies to the data model: Since there is an existing add-on for controlled vocabularies (INSERT LINK), DCAT interprets this to mean that the rights to use a controlled vocabulary and possibly link from an external source. Some examples would be the National Agricultural Library (linked open data) and the National Library of Medicine (subject based). 

2)   Updating the Qualified Dublin Core registry to the current DCMI standards and locking it down to ensure better standardization while still allowing for local customization 

3)   Enhancing the metadata available for Community, Collections and Files (bitstreams)

4)   Improvements in the UI - simplfying where/how things are done and bring more functionality to the UI

  1.  
  • No labels