...
Attendees
Amy Lana - University of Missouri
Augustine Gitonga - Aga Khan University Hospital
xBram Bram Luyten - @mire
Bharat M. Chaudhari -@ School Of Petroleum Management, Gandhinagar, India
Ciarán Walsh - Enovation Solutions, Ltd
Claire Bundy - BioMed Central
Dibyendra Hyoju - Madan Puraskar Pustakalaya/eIFL.net
Elena Feinstein - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
xElin Elin Stangeland - Cambridge University Library
xIryna Iryna Kuchma - eIFL.net
James Evans - Biomed Central/Open Repository
Jim Ottaviani - University of Michigan
Leonie Hayes - University of Auckland
Maureen Walsh - The Ohio State University
Roger Weaver - University of Missouri
xSarah Sarah Molloy - Queen Mary, University of London
xSarah Sarah Potvin - Texas A&M University
Sarah Shreeves - University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Sue Kunda - Oregon State University
Valorie Hollister - DuraSpace
Yan Han - University of Arizona Libraries
Time
- 10:00am Eastern/14:00 UTC
...
Discussion Notes/References
News
efil.net - launching new effort with ARL, CARL, ??
...
1) News
- Other - ARL/CARL/COAR/LIBER Project to identify new cometencies for academic libraries in supporting e-resarch and scholarly communications: http://www.arl.org/news/arl-news/2860-library-and-repository-communities-join-together-to-identify-new-competencies-for-academic-librarians
2) Metadata project
if can use f
- MetadataMapper
- will replace, assign, merge metadata
- Mark Wood and Richard agree that we need some validation capability
...
- , but not in this tool
- doesn't completely solve migration issues - mapping for tool needs to be defined in config, not available curation
...
- Sarah P.: can we test out tool
...
- before it is included in DSpace - will post comment on proposal page - ask if tool will be in 4.0
...
- and that DCAT is ready to help test - either now
...
- or during testathon
...
- Project chunks
- good idea to break up, get more people involved
- first 2 to start with
- validate preliminary DC mapping
- validate the phases/stagings - are all phases necessary/make sense: Proposal to Update QDC Registry and Add DCTERMS Registry
- Review group
- Sarah P.: was on NISO review group - great way to get feedback
- Sarah M.: can get people to participate for a short time because it is targeted and limited, locally refer to it as a
...
- "task & finish group"
dc mapping/crosswalk (usually references OAI-PHM crosswalk for DSpace dev)
...
- Val: perhaps review group/task & finish group could be used to validate the DC mapping, may allow for broader participation and for DC compliance experts outside DSpace community to participate because it is a defined/short period
- Bram: difference between terms – "mapping" vs. "crosswalk" from DSpace developers perspective - crosswalk usually references OAI-PMH – we should use the term "mapping"
- metadata team has done the preliminary DC mapping, needs to be reviewed and validated
- Val: perhaps review group/task & finish group could be used to validate the DC mapping, may allow for broader participation and for DC compliance experts outside DSpace community to participate because it is a defined/short period
...
-possible participant - Jessica Lindholm
need review / validation of staging - what we need to support as we continue to
...
- to confirm the end result compliant
...
- : https://docs.google.com/a/fedora-commons.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgU-htsSmo31dEtaM1M1Q2E1NlRxNG11ZHFrSkMxNFE#gid=0
- Sarah P.: is going to the DC conference in 2 weeks, will try to find some resources for a review group on mapping
- Elin: Jessica Lindholm from Univ of Malmo? in Sweden is a metadata expert
- Sarah P: metadata team needs to clean up the mapping a bit before review group
- Sarah: also believe that we need a review group to validate the staging/phases
- challenging to
- unpack all issues - technical
...
- infrastructure issues, dc compliance issues, etc.
...
- need dc
...
- experts to validate as well as dspace metadata experts, also broader community of what is supportable
...
- Actions:
- Actions:
...
- fix references to preliminary mappings on proposal page -
...
- make easier to find?
- add link to
...
- OR13 preso on proposal page
- clean up the preliminary DC mapping
...
- look at other applications using DC - Omeka uses unqualified DC, others?
- think about / ask others about who could participate in review groups
- contact volunteers to date to update them, ask for their feedback
3) JIRA issue DS-1583
needs a bit of clean up before asking for input
might be good to look at others using dc
omeka: users unqualified dc,
Actions Items
Action Item | Assignee | Deadline | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1) Metadata project - prepping for review group
| Metadata team - Sarah P., Bram, Amy, Maureen | ||||
2) Metadata project - research / brainstorm on recruiting
| ALL | ||||
| 3) Contact metadata project volunteers to date to update them, ask for their feedback on review group idea | Val | ||||
4) Re-start JIRA reviews a) Everyone should select a JIRA issue of interest (Bram's recommended view: https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/DS#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aissues-panel)
b) If the issue you select merits DCAT discussion (you want to confirm the importance of the request, want input on request, want to propose DCAT sending a msg to the listserve to find volunteers, etc.) please schedule the month for which you'd like to hold the discussion on the DCAT Discussion Schedule. If your JIRA issue doesn't merit a DCAT discussion, use JIRA to follow up directly. c) Monthly discussion leaders should use the DCAT Discussion Forum to start your discussions with the rest of DCAT. d) Post links/updates to the JIRA issue (summary of DCAT discussion with links to forum, etc.). | ALL | ||||
| 2) Add ideas to the brainstorm of next steps on metadata project - to get community involved, possible education component, start virtual discussion/wiki page: Metadata Project Next Steps
| ALL | 3) Publish to community to promote effort and seek input/help on working on DS-1583 to make translations easier | Bram | DONE |