Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

#

Time

Item

Information

Who

15 min

Welcome

  • Welcome to new Leadership Group members
Kristi Park
225 min

DSpace 7.0

  • Final beta
  • Testathon
  • 7.0 release

Update on the current status of DSpace 7 development and the forthcoming beta versions.

Tim Donohue

Maureen Walsh

315 minWorking and Interest Group Reports

Brief updates/Q&A from Working and Interest Group representatives.

DSpace Marketing Interest Group

DSpace

Governance Working Group (

2020-21)
  • DSpace Product Visioning Group
  • Written reports to be shared ahead of the meeting for review.

    wiki link)

    View file
    namedspace-governance-wg-update-2021-04-14.docx
    height250


    Product Visioning Working Group (wiki link)

    View file
    namedspace-product-visioning-wg-update-2021-04-14.docx
    height250


    Marketing Interest Group


    Kristi Park (chair, Governance Working Group)

    Scott Hanrath (chair, Product Visioning Working Group)

    Jenn Bielewski (chair, Marketing Interest Group)

    Jenn Bielewski

    Kristi Park

    Scott Hanrath

    45 min

     Financial report



    Laurie Arp
    515 minDSpace-LYRASIS MOU


    Kristi Park
    610 minDSpace 7.1 and 7.2 feature prioritization

    Review results of prioritization survey, which asked Leadership memberships to select features remaining int he backlog after 7.0 that they feel are most essential to prioritize for version 7.1.

    (Results to be shared ahead of the meeting for review)

    Open time for questions from Leadership about the survey and results.

    Kristi Park
    740 min

    Breakout discussions: Prioritization of features for DSpace 7.1

    Leaders will break into 4-5 randomly assigned groups to further discuss the prioritization of features for DSpace 7.1. We will take 25 minutes for breakout discussions and then return for 15 minutes to report to the full group.

    • If needed, conduct a brief round of introductions
    • Identify reporter to report highlights of the discussion out to the larger group.
    • Questions for discussion:
      • Were there results that surprised you?
      • Are there features you would argue should be higher (or lower) on the list?
      • What else should Steering and the DSpace 7 Working Group consider when prioritizing features for development in DSpace 7.1 not reflected in these results? (E.g. Can you identify dependencies for high-priority features that should be considered?)

    You can take notes in a Google doc that matches your Breakout Room number, linked to here



    Kristi Park, all
    65 minAny other business



    ...