- AEON updates next call
- Language Ontology:
- Melanie: https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/taskgroup/BABEL-TG-Charge.pdf (charge) https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/taskgroup/task-groups.html (report) mentions use of ISO-639 for languages. Implementation issues: if BIBFRAME it would use the ontology, if MARC, then codes.
Anna: Situation in Germany: MAB, PICA, etc.
https://dini.de/ag/kim/ / https://wiki.dnb.de/display/DINIAGKIM/Linked+Library+Data+Gruppe is working on the topic
- Switching to another date for the meeting - we have to wait for the LG to decide about their day. Best days seem to be Monday or Wednesday.
- Mike: We need to have specificity in our definition to better distinguish things. Class restrictions might be a viable way.
Blank nodes oftentimes lead to complications in implementation of ontologies
Brian: When VIVO was developed, class restrictions had to be blank nodes.