| 35m | Questions and discussion | All | DataCite DOIs from DataCite (why DataCite changes affected us) KE: Majority of EZID dev/UI costs due to DOI usage
RS: Can we split out ARK from DOI costs?
KW: What's the minimum required cost to keep the lights on?
RS: What's CDL's commitment to DOIs?
RS: Is EZID the AITO responsibility?
JK: --> NO!No RS: is $70K the minimum needed?
KE: yes, however, there's more needed in terms of community, eg, if someone
gave us that money, it would still be a CDL project, that requires CDL to
keep running it.
RS: why isn't it just a question of revenue?
KW: agreed
JK: we need help understanding who/what org gets paid the $70K to continue
ARK infrastructure
KE: agreed; how can we come up with $300K / year for phase1 goals and also next gen resolver?
KW: is there a need ? or that we're responding to? if not, are we willing to keep it going regardless of need?
is Is there a customer base to keep this going?
KE: I think the latter. We are in uncharted waters. What does it mean to see
all the expressions of interest we've seen
KW: what if we break down all the moneycosts, divide by divided the total by the number of people in the community, and ask if
they would be willing to pay that amount?
KE: yes, there are people paying vendors, some running their own infras.,infrastructure
RS: sounds very service oriented, like Crossref
KE: john John and I will try to refine language around the value proposition
KW: can we talk about the minimum viable product
JK: maybe a crossrefCrossref-type org is the right onemodel |