...
- Focus on Institutional needs (reporting of the institution members for scientific activity??)
- Consider different perspectives (end users, authors, co-authors, repository managers, research managers, funders)
- Funder monitoring (using existing API of OpenAIRE for funder compliance and monitoring) - Addon - https://gitlab.fccn.pt/dev-rcaap/addon-openaire/tree/OpenAIRE5.X
- Extended metadata schema - hierarchical metadata exposed - CERIF-XML ? (considered on the use cases).
- Metadata improvement by the submitter after deposit (with internal validation) ?new feature?
- What is the position of the Institutional Repository (of DSpace) in the landscape of other, similar software?
- Related reading: DSpace Positioning
- Background:
- Use Case Analysis
- Back in April, we took a stab at a similar question, attempting to get to a prioritized list of features. Discussing priority all the way down on the level of individual features and use cases was, in hindsight, probably too detailed.
What should be considered as "core" to DSpace and what shouldn't.
...