Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • what work needs to be done for 4.0?
  • what work is next before setting up review groups? 


 

Notes

 

Code freeze yesterday

 

Dec 4th is release - "experimental phase" - schema added for testing purposes, include update scripts in registry, Bram will f/u and make sure documentation covers change, get feedback from anyone in the community (new install or upgrade of 4.0) - if you don't touch use it, it won't affect you

Dimitrios - did DC to DC Terms mapping

We need DC Terms for OAI  - can't add this now - not exposed to OAI - not option for OAI (unless OAI for 2.0 included one)? Display issues / item import are no different from any other schema - must be added.

display

item import

OAI

---

doc - for testing purposes, point to current doc for adding local schema if you want to use locally (Bram)

check on OAI for 2.0 see if DC terms is in (Maureen) 

 

---

implications for new features, like RequestCopy, what metadata to use? dc.requestcopy.email, dc.requestcopy.name – use dspace.requestcopy.email, and dspace.requestcopy.name – need to keep running list of what needs to be cleaned up

--

revised proposal - make old one a child (to mtn history), revise proposal page on main page - streamline, focus on standards, don't focus on 'easing' as much, goal for 5.0 is to have everything in

new installs everything deafults to DC Terms, 2nd phase coould be to create tools to help w/upgrade

---

task & finish group - get DC experts, ask very concrete questions rather than open ended questions, after re-doing the proposal make list of questions,

Sarah: does  this create a need for hiearchal metadata; Maureen - have to think flatly, it is easier, less complicated

Sarah: do we need application profile or validator to support; Bram: already a default app profile with the req'd fields of title and date; Marueen: app profile is in order, would be good to create a draft application profile so it can be vetted – easier for people to give feedback on

---

tool richard talked about – query service to find out out people are using metadata fields - list schemas defined and identify the ones being used - web svc add on to dspace that could remotely query

task & finsh on project phasing

---