...
- Pure now has a SPARQL API that is compliant to the VIVO Ontology 1.6: https://helpcenter.pure.elsevier.com/en_US/release-notes-pure-520-4210/release-notes-pure-520-4210
- "Support for VIVO has been added to Pure as part of the Administrative module. When enabled this will provide you with a VIVO 1.6 compliant SPARQL endpoint to query as well as a test page in the Pure Experts Portal"
- Review of pull requests:
- https://github.com/vivo-ontologies/vivo-ontology/pull/1 - Added rdfs:comment for bibo:issue
- https://github.com/vivo-ontologies/vivo-ontology/pull/9 - Link to VIVO development process wiki page from readme
- https://github.com/vivo-ontologies/vivo-ontology/pull/11 - Add pull request template to vivo-ontology repository
- https://github.com/vivo-ontologies/vivo-ontology/pull/13 - Update new feature request issue template
- https://github.com/vivo-ontologies/vivo-ontology/pull/16 - Added licence to vivo.owl
- Feedback from Melanie: Review process is straightforward.
- https://github.com/vivo-ontologies/vivo-ontology/pull/1 - Added rdfs:comment for bibo:issue
Ontology release management- ...
no update
- ...
- Open Access Ontology
- https://github.com/tawahle/oa-ontology
- In Germany, all institutions from the Leibniz Association must submit an annual report on publications published in Open Access and its subtypes; ther German institutions needs the information about Open Access publications for variuos reports too - a need to cover this informatioin in VIVO.
- OA types align to the Unpaywall oa_status (Data Format | Unpaywall)
- Questions - could be there any implications because of:
- access types assigned additionally to skos:Concept
- vivo-oa:Open_Access_General has additionally skos:broader relation to vivo-oa:Open_Access_Diamond, vivo-oa:Open_Access_Green, vivo-oa:Open_Access_Gold, vivo-oa:Open_Access_Bronze, vivo-oa:Open_Access_Hybrid ?
- For now there are links to Open Access in Wikidata, Agrovoc and COAR (Controlled Vocabularies for Repositories: open access (coar-repositories.org)) via rdfs:seeAlso. Does it make sense to make the links via owl:sameAs?
- What is missing in the ontology?
- bibo:doi
- domain in VIVO - obo:IAO_0000030
- domain in https://github.com/structureddynamics/Bibliographic-Ontology-BIBO/blob/master/bibo.owl - <owl:unionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="&bibo;Collection"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="&bibo;Document"/>
</owl:unionOf>
Ideas for future meetings
...