Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Enhanced metadata for Communities, Collections and/or individual Files (bitstreams)

SURVEY

The priorities below are based on the fall 2011 community survey. They are listed in the order of how much community effort will be required, starting with relatively small amount of time/effort and moving on to more complex/time consuming projects.

1) Updating the Qualified Dublin Core registry in DSpace to the latest standards of the DCMI

  • LEVEL OF COMMUNITY EFFORT: likely small to medium effort
  • LEVEL OF DEVELOPER EFFORT: likely small to medium effort
  • need consensus/guidance from metadata experts in the community on what specifically needs to be fixed, which version of the DCMI standard should be used

2) Standardizing the default namespaces

  • LEVEL OF COMMUNITY EFFORT: likely small to medium effort
  • LEVEL OF DEVELOPER EFFORT: likely small to medium effort
  •  

     

     

     

3) Adding metadata authority controls/vocabularies to the data model

  • LEVEL OF COMMUNITY EFFORT: likely medium to high effort
  • LEVEL OF DEVELOPER EFFORT: likely medium to high effort
  • authority controls exist already, need to identify what specifically the community is lacking -- or is this more a training/educational task?
  • not allowed to ship DSpace w/Library of Congress headings
  • need to identify what the community thinks will work better in order to determine how big the problem is
  •  

4) Moving metadata related configurations from dspace.cfg to the database

  • LEVEL OF COMMUNITY EFFORT: likely medium to high effort
  • LEVEL OF DEVELOPER EFFORT: likely medium to high effort

5) Develop support for additional metadata standards (use the "Other" field to specify which standards)

  • LEVEL OF COMMUNITY EFFORT: likely medium to high effort
  • LEVEL OF DEVELOPER EFFORT: likely medium to high effort
  • depends on what schema (XML based schemas are more complex - dspace doesn't support XML - MODS,
  • MODS implemenation better done after fedora intergration since it is XML
  • need metadata expert

5) Enhancing the metadata available for Communities, Collections and Files (bitstreams)

  • LEVEL OF COMMUNITY EFFORT: likely high effort
  • LEVEL OF DEVELOPER EFFORT: likely high effort
  • get discussioin started and find some dev interested in archtecting it
  • very large changes, every single object in DSpace, will present and upgrading challenging to convert to an entirely different object model could be preparation for integration with Fedora - re-factoring how best we can re-work dspace to support in the next few versions - not a quick jump