Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • accrualPolicy
    • Domain: Collection
    • Range: Policy
    • Possible DSpace overlap: collection policies?
  • alternative
    • Domain: none
    • Range: Literal
    • Possible DSpace overlap: dc.title.alternative
  • audience
    • Domain: none
    • Range: AgentClass
    • Possible DSpace overlap: none?
  • available
    • Domain: none
    • Range: Literal
    • Possible DSpace overlap: dc.date.available
  • bibliographicCitation - INTERESTING ONE
    • Domain: BibliographicResource
    • Range: Literal
    • Possible DSpace overlap: dc.identifier.citation
  • conformsTo
    • Domain: none
    • Range: Standard
    • Possible DSpace overlap: none?
  • created
    • Domain: none
    • Range: Literal
    • Possible DSpace overlap: dc.date.created
  • dateAccepted
    • Domain:none
    • Range: Literal
    • Possible DSpace overlap: none?
  • dateCopyrighted
    • Domain:none
    • Range: Literal
    • Possible DSpace overlap: embargo solutions?
  • dateSubmitted
    • Domain:none
    • Range: Literal
    • Possible DSpace overlap: dc.date.submitted
  • educationLevel
    • Domain:none
    • Range:AgentClass
    • Possible DSpace overlap: none?
  • extent
    • Domain:none
    • Range: SizeOrDuration
    • Possible DSpace overlap: dc.format.extent
  • hasFormat
    • Domain: none
    • Range: none (YET)
    • Note: This term is intended to be used with NON-LITERAL values. As of December 2007, the DCMI Usage board is seeking a way to express this intention with a formal range declaration.
    • Possible DSpace overlap: none?
  • hasPart
    • Domain: none
    • Range: none (YET)
    • Note: This term is intended to be used with NON-LITERAL values. As of December 2007, the DCMI Usage board is seeking a way to express this intention with a formal range declaration.
    • Possible DSpace overlap: dc.relation.haspart
  • hasVersion
    • Domain: none
    • Range: none (YET)
    • Note: This term is intended to be used with NON-LITERAL values. As of December 2007, the DCMI Usage board is seeking a way to express this intention with a formal range declaration.
    • Possible DSpace overlap: dc.relation.hasversion
  • instructionalMethod
    • Domain: none
    • Range: MethodOfInstruction
    • Possible DSpace overlap: none?
  • isFormatOf
    • Domain: none
    • Range: none (YET)
    • Note: This term is intended to be used with NON-LITERAL values. As of December 2007, the DCMI Usage board is seeking a way to express this intention with a formal range declaration.
    • Possible DSpace overlap: dc.relation.isformatof
  • isPartOf
    • Domain: none
    • Range: none (YET)
    • Note: This term is intended to be used with NON-LITERAL values. As of December 2007, the DCMI Usage board is seeking a way to express this intention with a formal range declaration.
    • Possible DSpace overlap: dc.relation.ispartof
  • isReferencedBy
    • Domain: none
    • Range: none (YET)
    • Note: This term is intended to be used with NON-LITERAL values. As of December 2007, the DCMI Usage board is seeking a way to express this intention with a formal range declaration.
    • Possible DSpace overlap: dc.relation.isreferencedby
  • isReplacedBy
    • Domain: none
    • Range: none (YET)
    • Note: This term is intended to be used with NON-LITERAL values. As of December 2007, the DCMI Usage board is seeking a way to express this intention with a formal range declaration.
    • Possible DSpace overlap: dc.relation.isreplacedby
  • isRequiredBy
    • Domain: none
    • Range: none (YET)
    • Note: This term is intended to be used with NON-LITERAL values. As of December 2007, the DCMI Usage board is seeking a way to express this intention with a formal range declaration.
    • Possible DSpace overlap: none?
  • issued
    • Domain: none
    • Range: Literal
    • Possible DSpace overlap: dc.date.issued
  • isVersionOf
    • Domain: none
    • Range: none (YET)
    • Note: This term is intended to be used with NON-LITERAL values. As of December 2007, the DCMI Usage board is seeking a way to express this intention with a formal range declaration.
    • Possible DSpace overlap: dc.relation.isversionof
  • license Tricky one
    • Domain: none
    • Range: LicenseDocument
    • Possible DSpace overlap: item license
  • mediator
    • Domain: none
    • Range: AgentClass
    • Possible DSpace overlap: none?

Possible Approaches

Adding a new schema dcterms that lives next to the standard dc schema

...