BC: in favor of categorization; I'm wondering whether the list encompasses projects and publications MG: what is the goal; maybe we should just put this in the "parking lot of ideas" to think about since we don't have a burning need to take action on this JK: but there's also an "opportunity cost" if we don't act since the work that Chloé has done on the legacy will lose its value if we wait so long that it has to be redone CP: I'm willing to continue on WG past internship AC: adding categories has implications for the Outreach WG and general outreach that my org is thinking for supporting French users ACTION: ask Outreach WG for feedback on institutional type field
map automation report
Chloé / John
CP: I used the Leaflet service to convert postal address to lat/lon coordinates; OpenStreetMap is used to display a point on the global map; hovering over a point shows any/all fields you want
JK: another opportunity cost, since Chloe's changed many addresses by hand BC: map is promising BM: could be useful decreasing workload; I like that it's using open source and open data
recent curation issues
adding an update function to new request form
change of NAAN policy
Group is ok with adding an update function to the "new" naan request form.
BC: re. NAAN change, there was a similar (and worse case) with the Catalog Collectif de France (CCFr), which just made up their own NAANs, which they were discouraged from doing ACTION: see if CCFr did indeed stop using their own NAANs ACTION: draft a policy statement in response to "we would like a different NAAN"
MG, BC: ok with the rejection of two recent requests: one from an individual, one test/spurious