Date
Attendees
Discussion items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
current survey status use inputs to inform next survey? | Ready to go by the end of this week; requesting responses in two weeks. First group will be EOI respondents, then the NAAN registrants. This group "owns" the results and prepares the next survey. | ||
FAQ v0.91 still in-progress Question: final review phase at ARKs forum/mailing list ? | After mailing list review, then declare it finished for a year. Wait for translation to French? maybe not – this could be asynchronous. Keep an eye on translations to Spanish and French. | ||
| animation ideas; who can help with storyboarding? | 2-minute maximum, rather than 5-minute; more like TV commercial KE: recommend role of persona, Kurt, at org Y, who has problem Z, and here's how ARKs makes things better; what are those roles? what are make it better? KE: want them to be generic so they cover broad base Roles: curator in museum, librarians from catalog side, digital library, virtual exhibitions archivist working with special collections "things don't break until system-to-system migration" TS: people don't realize they need PIDs until they realize that their ids were going to break TS: we're going to have to change every reference to the old stuff in, and this will happen again and again "I have legacy ids" Collection management (archivesspace) Content management (contentdm) DAMS (more backend digital preservation) JK: what about journal systems like OJS MG: maybe "librarian" is too general, better might "digital repository/scholarship librarian" JK: museums sometimes want to leverage legacy identifiers | ||
| LYRASIS webinar offer; what topics to cover in a 1-hour session? | TS: would be really helpful to know, which LYRASIS-supported tools work with ARKs? KE: maybe the topic could be more generic, such as the benefits of PIDs TS: Archivesspace is really about finding aids; Islandora could use ARK support |
