You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

Time/Place

This meeting is a hybrid teleconference and IRC chat. Anyone is welcome to join...here's the info:

Attendees 

Agenda

  1. What are details that we should articulate related to a proposed 4.7 LTS?

  2. Gradle as build tooling
  3. Possible messaging memory leak?  
  4. Tickets/PRs that need merging:
    1. Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.  - PR#1213 (4.7-maintenance cherry-pick)
    2. Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.  - PR#1220 (4.7-maintenance cherry-pick)
    3. Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.  - PR#45 (4.7-maintenance cherry-pick)
  5. Ben Pennell's Import Export of Versions PR https://github.com/fcrepo4-labs/fcrepo-import-export/pull/109
  6. Status of "in-flight" tickets

    type key summary assignee reporter priority status resolution created updated due

    Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.

Ticket Summaries

  1. Please squash a bug!

    key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution

    Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.

  2. Tickets resolved this week:

    key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution

    Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.

  3. Tickets created this week:

    key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution

    Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.

Minutes


  1. Intent and ground rules for LTS:
    1. How long will the LTS be maintained?  When do we stop supporting it? 
      1. Consensus: 3 years
        1. Jared Whiklo:  smaller institiutions need reassurance that investments in technology will have some known duration.
          1. There are still people using Fedora 3.7.x
      2. Esme proposed an annual review of who is using it and semi-annua/annual commitments to maintain the LTS
        1. Jared Whiklo:  won't instill confidence in smaller institutitions if a version can go away when committers decide we are no longer interested in maintaining.
        2. Esmé Cowles :  yes,  making explicit the general timescale for maintainence is important in any case.
    2. What will be maintained? 
      1. Bug fixes
      2. Migration paths to later versions?
      3. No commitment to backporting features
      4. ongoing JVM support?  
        1. Doesn't sound like fun, but java 8 is approaching end of life. 
        2. To be evaluated in the annual review:  Question depends of whether users have options.
        3. Perhaps we should not necessarily commit to support Java 9.   But will support it to the extent that there is community interest.
      5. ?
  • No labels