Time/Place
- Time: 12:00pm Eastern Time US
- Dial-in Number: (712) 775-7035
- Participant Code: 479307#
- International numbers: Conference Call Information
- Web Access: https://www.freeconferencecallhd.com/wp-content/themes/responsive/flashphone/flash-phone.php
Attendees
- Nick Ruest
- Andrew Woods
- Jamie Little
- Bridget Almas
- Esmé Cowles
- Youn Noh
- David Wilcox
- Joshua Westgard
- Michael J. Giarlo
Related
Agenda
- Overview of Phase 1 work & stakeholder feedback
- Review of current state
- Completed Phase-1 requirements
- Not yet completed Phase-1 requirements
- Open tickets
- A few additional questions that have arisen during testing:
- Best way to represent redirects (specifically, is the zero-byte placeholder useful?)
- Specifying a location for the config when one does not exist
- Handling slash vs. no slash at the end of the base repository path
- How can we improve the stakeholder engagement/feedback process?
- Verification tool
- see also, for a version that verifies RDF: https://github.com/jwestgard/fcrepo-import-export-verify
- Review of current state
- Overview of Phase 2 requirements
- Support import from and export to a TBD list of external systems
- APTrust
- Archivematica
- MetaArchive
- Support transacting in BagIt bags
- Support export of resource and its "members" based on a user-provided membership predicate
- Single resource bags
- The structure and scope of accepted and produced BagIt bags must be configurable
- Clarification: structure relates to required and optional tagfiles in the bag
- Clarification: scope relates to contents of the bag, e.g. single object or object and all members based on specific membership predicate
- Overview of existing Phase 2 tickets
- Support import from and export to a TBD list of external systems
- Sprint resources
- Developers
- Testing and Validation
- Documentation
- ...
Minutes
- Review of the requirements from Phase 1:
- RDF
- Binaries
- References
- Discussion of external references and the creation of binary placeholder files
- action item: Josh will create a ticket for handling this
- LDP contains predicate
- Round-tripping: yes with an asterisk for the pair-tree issue (FCREPO-2240)
- Outstanding issues: pairtree issue mentioned above
- Open tickets:
- Pairtree issue
- Loss of namespace prefixes
- Phase 2 requirements (Bagit)
- Getting more stakeholder feedback:
- Would a template such as that employed for release testing be useful?
- This could box them into testing in a way that is not helpful
- Action Item: Josh will create a single wiki page with links to the tooling and instructions that stakeholders can be directed to
- It seems reasonable to ping folks who signed up but who have not yet provided feedback