You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

Add Unit Testing to Dspace - Pere Villega

Dspace currently lacks unit testing, which harms the development of the platform and makes easier to reintroduce past bugs while developing. This project is a proposal to add a set of unit test classes to Dspace, based on JUnit, plus some tools that detect issues in the code so we can improve its quality. - Pere Villega

On Testing

Due to the extension of the subject a new page has been created with more details. Please check [Testing] for more information on unit testing

Existing approaches

So far there's been some approaches to the problem. As far as we know, the following:

Next there is a table that compares these and some other approaches to the problem:

Tools

Type

Notes

JUnit + JMock

Unit Testing

Dspace is tightly integrated with the database (see notes above) which complicates the task of creating a unit test

JUnit + HTMLUnit

Functional

Uses a embedded webserver to run Dspace and runs the tests, using ant, against this instance

Selenium

Functional

Can be run against any running Dspace instance and using several browsers

JUnit + ContiPerf

Unit Testing + Performance Testing

Suffers from the same issues as other Unit Tests, tight integration with database

As we see we have two main approaches:

  • Unit testing: automated, suffers from tight integration with database. Refactoring of code would be advisable, but it can be avoided by using Mocks. Tests at low level, just ensuring a class is correct, not checking the whole functionality. Can allow performance testing via ContiPerf.
  • Functional testing: doesn't suffer from database integration. Ensure the functionality works, but it may not account for certain situations that would raise errors due to code bugs.

Both would benefit DSpace, as unit testing would ensure code quality while functional testing would ensure the application behaves as expected with standard usage.

Proposals

The proposals for the project are:

  • Create a framework for Functional Tests, Integration Tests, Unit Tests and Performance Tests that run automatically on build (when possible)
    • I will create all the background require (mockups, database connections, configs, etc) for the tests to be run
    • I will integrate Cobertura to create reports on the testing coverage
  • Integrate with a Continuous Integration server
  • (Optional but recommended) Integrate with a code quality management tool

Scope

The main scope of the project is to apply the proposals to the API core. Once done, work would be extended in the remaining time to Manakin and then other subprojects (Sword, LNI, OIA). JSPUI will be left for last, as is an interface that will disappear in the future.

Considerations

DSpace code suffers from testability issues. In the long term it might be advisable to refactor it. Refactoring is dangerous right now as we don't have any test and we risk introducing new bugs to the code base, so it should be avoided until we have enough tests working that makes us confidant we can take that road.

Project Description

At first three basic objects will be created: an Abstract Functional Test, an Abstract Integration Test, and if needed an Abstract Unit Tests. These basic abstract tests would be able to preform the basic setup and teardown operations to get those resources needed: database, etc. The structure will include an embedded webserver, database and temporary file system.

Performance Testing will be achieved through the use of ContiPerf, a tool that reuses JUnit tests as performance tests.

Project Plan

A work plan has to established that will outline:

  • Work to be done by mid-term evaluation
  • Work to be done by end of GSOC
  • Documentation to be generated

Tools

  • The Continuous Integration server will be Hudson.
  • All tests will be run automatically by Maven
    • Embedded webserver will be Jetty
    • Embedded database will be HyperSQL [http://hsqldb.org/ ]

  • Functional Tests will use Selenium
  • Unit Tests and Integration Tests will use Junit
    • JMock will be used as mocking framework
    • HTMLUnit may be used if required
  • Performance Tests will use ContiPerf

Thanks

This page has been created with help from Stuart Lewis, Scott Phillips and Gareth Waller. I want to thank them all for their comments. Some information has been taken from Wikipedia to make the text more complete. I'm to blame for errors in the text.

Feel free to contribute to this page!

  • No labels