You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 16 Next »

Time/Place

This meeting is a hybrid teleconference and slack chat. Anyone is welcome to join...here's the info:

Attendees

Part 1: 

  1. Danny Bernstein 
  2. Peter Winckles 
  3. Jared Whiklo 
  4. Bethany Seeger 
  5. Thomas Bernhart  
  6. Aaron Birkland (star)
  7. Andrew Woods  
  8. Ben Pennell 
  9. Ben Cail 
  10. David Wilcox
  11. Peter Eichman 
  12. Joseph Rhoads
  13. Daniel Lamb

Agenda

  1. Announcements 
    1. Sprint 2
    2. Results of documentation review
  2. Fedora and OCFL
    1. OCFL Editorial updates: 
      1. Tuesday's meeting notes: https://github.com/OCFL/spec/wiki/2019.10.29-Editors-Meeting
      2. Draft pull-request detailing "extensions": https://github.com/OCFL/spec/pull/404
    2. "Mutable HEAD Extension" draft specification
  3. Updates to the Persistence API
    1. Proposed implementation approaches 
  4. Draft functional requirements for repositories based on NDSA Levels of Preservation 2.0


Tickets

  1. In Review

    type key summary assignee reporter priority status resolution created updated due

    Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.

  2. Please squash a bug!

    key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution

    Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.

  3. Tickets resolved this week:

    key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution

    Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.

  4. Tickets created this week:

    key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution

    Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.

Notes

Documentation Review

  • Small number of folks met Oct 28th for doing a one-day documentation review.
    • Not a technical review, focused on community perspectives
    • Marked docs that could be improved
    • Good notes/suggestions on ways things can be improved.  Mostly around better organization, de-duplication, defining things better.  These notes can drive documentation updates
    • There may be a couple people who are interested in documentation during the sprint, but there may be enough suggestions to support a documentation sprint later on this year or next year.
    • Most of the suggested improvements are not technical, so it is not necessary for doc writers to be committers, developers, etc
    • awoods: Each release has their own wiki space, but we have a 5.x "head".  It looks like the 5.x "head" is what was reviewed.  Presumably, it'll be re-named to 6.0.  A bulk of the review is likely based on 4.x/5.x understanding.  New content and/or updates would need to be added for fcrepo6
      • dwilcox: Hopefully, the front-facing parts of fcrepo6 won't change that much from 4/5, but new docs will be needed.
    • Fcrepo6 documentation was out of scope for this review.  That could be its own sprint, not sure if it should be its own separate effort, or part of a fcrepo6 sprint.  Difficult to do anything for fcrepo6 yet, since it doesn't exist.  It'd be difficult to write docs for it at this point.
    • Desire for a regular rhythm for doc updates. 

Documentation:

  • Islandora stores it's documentation in Markdown .  Might be something we want to consider for Fedora.  
    • It makes it easier to couple code changes with documentation changes.
    • ISLE also does this.  
    • There are pros/cons to docs in markdown, but it'll be interesting to watch how other projects evolve

Fedora and OCFL:


Actions


  • No labels

All content on the LYRASIS Wiki is licensed under the CC BY (Attribution) license, unless otherwise noted.