You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

LD4P ISNI kickoff, April 29, 2019

ISNI: Areas of interest per institution:

  • Alberta: Canadian persons, including French names
  • UC San Diego: possibly Sinopia entities as needed; entities in our local digital asset management system
  • Duke: local Duke names; possibly unmatched headings in our special collection
  • Michigan: video recordings, video games and music is focus for LD4P; also uses in CJK cataloging and Eastern European non-Roman cataloging
  • NLM: entities not established elsewhere for their monographic cataloging; possibly for intersections with their LD4P focus on corporate bodies in their serials if original identifiers are needed
  • Northwestern: poster and other visual materials
  • Penn: entities not established in LC NAF for Sinopia descriptions
  • Princeton:  focus on non-Roman script names; focused on also comparing workflows that compare NACO work to ISNI
  • Harry Ransom Center: archival context for local name authority file; also possible use in Sinopia
  • Yale: [no one reported at the 4/29 meeting]

Training walkthrough and brief demo of web interface: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/PCCISNI/PCC+ISNI+documentation+and+training

Assignment: edit or create 5-10 ISNIs over the next week

Questions:

  • Q: Should we keep stats? A: There is no PCC obligation to keep stats at this time.  Institutions may choose to keep them internally; for example, this is what Harvard does as a way to track identity management activities and any trends associated with that work.
  • Q: News on adding ISNIs to NACO in $024? A: Paul Frank to report on this question at PCC Operations Committee at end of week.  We’ll additionally distribute that info to the group.

Recording of the call: ******

  • No labels