Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Principal Investigator (PI) Identifier (recommended to use either ORCID or ISNI)
    • General Comments:
      • Is capturing this identifier as a simple metadata field "good enough"?
      • Are researchers expected to just enter their own ORCID?  Or do we need some sort of more complex "lookup" for each author entered?
  2. Award Identification Number - assigned by Federal agencies
    • General Comments:
      • Unclear if this is a single field or multiple fields. It seems as though we'd need to also store information about the agency who assigned the number (for uniqueness), unless the "identification number" includes a code which identifies the agency.
  3. Copyright License Terms - "requires a standardized and coded expression ... for machine processing"
    • General Comments:
      • How would this be "coded"?  We'd need a centrally defined "standard" representation that all repositories can attempt to implement.
  4. Repository Designation ID Number - "to identify the repository access location"
    • General Comments:
      • Who defines this "number"?  Could this simply be the repository URL, or a persistent identifier which resolves to the repository URL?
  5. Preservation Rights - "required to be coded into the metadata residing with the record"
    • General Comments:
      • How would this be "coded"?  We'd need a centrally defined "standard" representation that all repositories can attempt to implement.

...