Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Notes

  • CodeQL GitHub action is broken

DRAGAN: Small PR, just to inform everyone it exists.

  • The program for the SWIB conference is online

DRAGAN: there is a conference at the beginning of september and it looks like the program is published. On monday 11th of Sept there will be a VIVO meetup inside the conference, only physical on site but I’m not sure. Georgy will present something, do we have an opportunity to join online?

GEORGY: I’m not sure if someone could join online.

  • BrCris

DRAGAN: In the middle of july the BrCRIS was launched, and one component of it is VIVO. Very important for us to see it run on big amount of data. Have in mind that this is not pure VIVO but some hybrid version that is using kibana dashboards etc. Washington would like to present something from this VIVO. They would like to contribute some visualizations to VIVO as well. Presentation will take place on sept or oct during our weekly tuesday meetings most likely.

  • Pamplona (Spain) euroCRIS strategic meeting in November 

DRAGAN: Agenda is officially published, board meeting + CERIF. After that, a lot of CRIS presentations will take place. Anyone is encouraged to apply for the presentation, the price is not high and there are even a few discounts for the euroCRIS members. Next year the meeting will be in Austria, everyone is invited to come. 

  • Dynamic API presentation

DRAGAN: In september dynapi presentation will be organised most likely. I hope that in the forthcoming minor release the dynapi will be a part of VIVO. We spend a lot of time and effort and we will need to find a way to present the power of it in the best way possible. There are already some examples for generic reporting, but it will be extended in some CRUD operations, for persons or OU… This can be the beginning of re-engineering VIVO.

  • The issue with performance reported via Slack (VIVO 1.13.0)

DRAGAN: Reported via Slack. I tried to ask whether its possible to use 1.14, maybe it was an issue in SDB to TDB migration. Anyway we will see where the discussion will go and I might open a GitHub issue.

Draft notes in Google Docs

...