Versions Compared

Old Version 237

changes.mady.by.user Tim Donohue

Saved on

compared with

New Version 238

changes.mady.by.user Tim Donohue

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • If any dependencies are listed with an "UNKNOWN" license, then that means that dependency failed to specify its OS License in their own Maven POM file. We will need to manually lookup the license for that project, and manually add it to our src/main/license/LICENSES_THIRD_PARTY.properties file which corrects all "UNKNOWN" licenses. Finally, rerun the command above to regenerate the new LICENSES_THIRD_PARTY based on this update.
  • If any dependencies are listed under an INCOMPATIBLE License (GPL, AGPL, etc), then we need to take a closer look at that dependency.  It is possible that the dependency is dual-licensed and therefore may be listed multiple times in the generated LICENSES_THIRD_PARTY file. If so, that's fine. If not, we may need to remove that dependency prior to the release.
  • If any Open Source Licenses are listed under multiple names (e.g. "BSD" vs. "BSD License" vs. "BSD licence"), then we may need to update our POM configurations for the codehaus license-maven-plugin to tell it to merge licenses of those names into one. Those configurations are in the Parent POM under the <licenseMerges> tag of this plugin: https://github.com/DSpace/DSpace/blob/mastermain/pom.xml#L406xml#L713

If the file was updated, commit it.

...