Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Starting security rewrite
  • Talked with Chi, one other developer from UPEI.
  • Goal to have finished and ready at open repositories in May
  • Sketching out deliverables
  • Getting budget stuff worked out, who for what, etc.
  • Goal of drop-in rewrite of XACML architecture
  • But give choice for role-base authorization
  • Thinks it would be great to have a drop-in for AuthN like OpenID
  • Mark Leggot of UPEI is funding initial work
  • Some interest from Stanford
  • Some support from FC
  • Ultimately want maintained by Fedora Commons
  • Has a google doc for this, will share w/other committers

Chris

  • Lightening up the processes
  • Make it more inviting
  • Branching - only when needed
  • Code reviews - only when needed
  • Trunk == important to keep it clean, but not immaculate
  • JIRA - Keep status directly in Bugs and Features
  • Message to indiv when success
  • , code tasks still available, but compulsory.
  • Hoping to have bamboo up for continuous integration this week.  Should help us get comfortable with making direct trunk commits.
  • On commit, run a test.  Send message to committer when successful, or message to codewatch if fails (then another "fixed" message to codewatch when somebody fixes it).Message to all if fail, then msg to all again when fixed
  • Did bugfix in AuthN code, want to see if Kai wants to be involved in AuthN rework
  • Will talk w/Andrew Monday about first bug to bite off

...

  • Will be having call with IA, curious about setup and at NSDL

Bill

  • Admin client has been only Fedora task
  • Remainder has been Duraspace

...