Versions Compared

Old Version 8

changes.mady.by.user Carol Minton Morris

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Nelson Torres

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

 

 

Attendees

Apologies

Goals

  • Convening efforts to reach out and deeply engage the DSpace community in the aspects of DSpace 7 development. 
  • Next meeting Feb 22: 12:00 PM ET; UTC 17:00, on https://www.uberconference.com/duraspace

Discussion items

ItemWho

Catch-up, Announcements

All

Review new resources:

Wouter Janssens (Atmire) 

Carol Minton Morris

Short repository implementors survey update

(editable link - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h46fFY2MtNCD7j-ly0lCHaaR2VeL1ZwdhjGlmuvkuCc/edit?usp=sharing )

Jose Carvalho

Review use cases related to browse and search

Currently, the following use cases describe the search and browse functionalities of DSpace.

Wouter Janssens (Atmire)
Latest news ideas (tabled)Carol Minton Morris
Other

Notes

Catch-up, Announcements

...

  • To be effective would have to be in multiple languages
  • Aim is to provide an overview of the use of repos with DSpace, may influence or justify why there are certain functionalities in DSpace 7
  • Key questions are 1, 3, 4
  • Wondering about the timeline for the survey and how/if we can use it to influence current development objectives?
  • Current roadmap specifies overall major improvements; question of which functionalities you prefer
  • No capacity to get new features based on this data into the scope for DSpace 7 alpha release
  • Management of community expectations is a consideration
  • First question—what types of DSpace repos do we have?
    • Carol to find- distribute 2014 community DSpace Vision survey to Survey (note: this page also includes information on all previous community surveys) to this group
    • Some answers about type of repositories available from this survey
  • Perhaps devising an ongoing line of communication/method for all future technical development where community can provide continuous updates/feedback–registry, other system, regular surveys–would be a useful task for this group?
  • Discussion tabled for next meeting 

...

  • Because we ran out of time and this review is critical, the group will meet again next week Feb 22: 12:00 PM ET; UTC 17:00 to complete the review.

Action Items