Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Reverted from v. 10

...

Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://duraspace.zoom.us/j/952326581

Or iPhone one-tap :
    US: +16468769923,,952326581#  or +16699006833,,952326581# 
Or Telephone:
    Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): 
        US: +1 646 876 9923  or +1 669 900 6833  or +1 408 638 0968 
    Meeting ID: 952 326 581
    International numbers available: https://duraspace.zoom.us/zoomconference?m=UwwKqz4RbGAsBAZgCE9XMorMuL0CeV4Q

more details»  copy to my calendar

Attendees

Resources

Ontology Interest Group Google Folder https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1RGBh4fDZdzpJdwyiUMO8OPWwkcmVYrI0

...

  1. Updates
    1. Updated documents since our last meeting:
      1. Updated: Early Thoughts on VIVO Subsumption Hierarchy http://bit.ly/2Ekg7m6
      2. UpdatedNew: Early Thoughts on Representing Roles Grants and Relationships Projects in VIVO http://bit.ly/2DOCEar2Iwaeoj
      3. Updated: Early Thoughts on Ontologies Used in VIVO: VIVO Subsumption Hierarchy http://bit.ly/2F5z2Bx2Ekg7m6
      4. Updated: VIVO Ontology Version 2 Early Thoughts on Open Ontology Issues http://bit.ly/2R8gYuI2Rc67BK
      5. Updated: Early Thoughts on Related Domains Representing Language Capabilities in VIVO http://bit.ly/2ERA3xa2Rbi8XY
    2. Trello board.  See https://trello.com/b/L1b80jtm/version-2-ontology Cards are labeled with blue if they have a corresponding document, and yellow if there is a discussion required about how to proceed. Many cards updated.
    3. Conference submissions accepted:
      1. Presentation on VIVO Ontology work
      2. Poster on related domains
    4. International Conference on Biomedical Ontologies (ICBO), Buffalo, New York, July 29-August 2.  https://sites.google.com/view/icbo2019/home
  2. Discussion regarding how to proceed – Christian, all
  3. Aligning semantics – EuroCRIS proposal
  4. Could new language semantics be used with the existing VIVO ontology?
  5. Time semantics.  How to represent the semantics around instants and intervals.  What does "x has time interval y" mean?  What does "x has time instant z" mean?

Google doc for notes:  http://bit.ly/2HqiW6R

Notes

  1. Updates

Action Items

  •  Type your task here, using "@" to assign to a user and "//" to select a due date
  1. proposal – Mike, all
  2. Topics for future meetings. All
  3. No meeting June 27. Next meeting July 11.

Google doc for notes: http://bit.ly/2R7dSZm

Notes

  1. Updates (see above)
  2. How to proceed
    • Christian: Start from more abstract to concrete. Begin by defining concepts (http://bit.ly/2Ekg7m6).
      • Mike: May need to go back-and-forth. It’s not a concrete definition, but a suggestion that may be changed later.
      • Brian: Can pick a document and have a “homework assignment” where we decide what changes we think can be made and then meet back together and discuss what we came up with.
      • Following discussion, group agreed to the homework approach.
  3. EuroCRIS interested in an MOU with the VIVO Project
    • Meeting was held in Helsinki with Ed Simon, Jan, Michelle of EuroCRIS, Mike (VIVO), Anna (SIGMA)
    • Mike: EuroCRIS expressed interest in 2 initiatives:  1) Cerif to VIVO conversion (no interest for now in other direction). Could possibly be a project starting at SIGMA. Not a description of how to map- a working tool.
      • A lot of the semantics are in code tables that can be heavily customized locally.
      • Can a tool be built that converts CERIF 2 VIVO and allows others to use local code tables?
    • Second interest, Aligning semantics across a series of projects. (OpenAire, FAIR, CASRAI, VIVO, Freya, ORCiD, Cerif, COAR, KDSF, OBO, etc.)
      • Brian: What kind of output? A common ontology or mappings?
        • Mike: That would be the first work item to consider.
      • Christian: This seems like a really large project.
      • Mike: Getting people together to discuss this might make people realize how big the project is.
      • Mike: Aligning ontologies is feasible.  But some people only have a data model, a data structure (relational tables or JSON) and documentation.  We have had this since the 1970s.
      • Research Graph has a large scale research graph.  http://researchgraph.org
      • RDA may be forming a research graph working group.  
      • Freya is creating a “PID Graph” connecting research entities via persistent identifiers
  4. Home assigned. (smile) See action item
  5. Next meeting July 11.


Action Items


In Progress or Review Ontology Issues

...