...
Agenda
- Review of the CERIF2VIVO mapping
- Equipment / Infrastructure / Facilities section is very large in CERIF
- might be worth to think of implied processes in VIVO/OBO
- Use case: Who possessed an instrument at what time, which publications resulted from that possession?
- For VIVO Ontology 2.0
- https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/persistent-identification-instruments/case-statement/persistent-identification-instruments
- Presentation at VIVO Conference 2020: https://av.tib.eu/media/48007
- Stocker, M., Darroch, L., Krahl, R., Habermann, T., Devaraju, A., Schwardmann, U., D'Onofrio, C. and Häggström, I., 2020. Persistent Identification of Instruments. Data Science Journal, 19(1), p.18. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-018
- A joint and coordinated review of the proposed modifications was carried out up to this point and will be continued at the next meeting (13 December)
- Equipment / Infrastructure / Facilities section is very large in CERIF
- Repository and issue management
- https://github.com/vivo-ontologies will be used in future
- Issues from https://github.com/openrif/vivo-isf-ontology/labels/VIVO should be migrated
- Issues from Lyrasis JIRA should be migrated, too.
- Ralph O'Flinn will try to get access to the repository from Mike Conlon, Andrew, or Javed.