Date
Attendees
- This is the subgroup dealing with ?info inflection
...
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
CNI panel proposal | group agreed with panel goals to be submitted later today | ||
ARKs forum email, Feb 1 Case of percent-encoded character | Greg to take on | ||
ISSN-origin NAANs – ok to proceed if we issue this warning? There is a caveat. A NAAN assignment with provenance from an ISSN is considered to be a permanent association with a journal, and never an association with an ISSN. We understand that the ISSN for a journal does not change often, but the NAAN for a journal cannot be changed. Thus, the "s" in front of the NAAN only indicates origin, at a moment in time, of the NAAN. After the NAAN is associated with a journal, the NAAN registry has no connection whatsoever with future assignments of the original ISSN to other journals. This is a consequence of the ARK identifier's design to support permanence. | John to ask larger group to review | ||
Networked Entity Model | Model to describe fundamentally distinct entity types covered by ARKs, so that the ?info spec can describe type-specific instructions. GJ: maybe new identifiers is a better way to go for dig/phys BC: where would you put ark for catalog record for document A vs ark for document A representation 1 vs ark for document A representation 2? KH: for Portico, hierarchical representation would be important, eg, article level is a slug |
Action items
- Greg Janée to respond to Mario
- John Kunze to submit panel proposal
- John Kunze to ask larger group to review ISSN-origin NAANs
- Karen Hanson to send something on the Portico model