...
Please squash a bug!
Expand Jira server DuraSpace JIRA columns key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution maximumIssues 20 jqlQuery filter=13122 serverId c815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5 Tickets resolved this week:
Expand Jira server DuraSpace JIRA columns key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution maximumIssues 20 jqlQuery filter=13111 serverId c815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5 Tickets created this week:
Expand Jira server DuraSpace JIRA columns key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution maximumIssues 20 jqlQuery filter=13029 serverId c815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5
Minutes
- Intent and ground rules for LTS:
- How long will the LTS be maintained? When do we stop supporting it?
- Consensus: 3 years
- Jared Whiklo: smaller institiutions need reassurance that investments in technology will have some known duration.
- There are still people using Fedora 3.7.x
- Jared Whiklo: smaller institiutions need reassurance that investments in technology will have some known duration.
- Esme proposed an annual review of who is using it and semi-annua/annual commitments to maintain the LTS
- Jared Whiklo: won't instill confidence in smaller institutitions if a version can go away when committers decide we are no longer interested in maintaining.
- Esmé Cowles : yes, making explicit the general timescale for maintainence is important in any case.
- Consensus: 3 years
- What will be maintained?
- Bug fixes
- Migration paths to later versions?
- No commitment to backporting features
- ongoing JVM support?
- Doesn't sound like fun, but java 8 is approaching end of life.
- To be evaluated in the annual review: Question depends of whether users have options.
- Perhaps we should not necessarily commit to support Java 9. But will support it to the extent that there is community interest.
- ?
- How long will the LTS be maintained? When do we stop supporting it?