Versions Compared

Old Version 40

changes.mady.by.user Ivan Masár

Saved on

compared with

New Version 41

changes.mady.by.user Ivan Masár

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Q: Theme per collection/community/site – we should support out of the box. (Ivan)

 

Q: Angular components (?)

A: Can be moved around, HTML-like snippets. (Tim) Creating new components is simple (Art)

 

Q: Architecture diagram? What components are being used? (Pascal)

A: Tomcat, Node.js, don’t need to be on the same server

 

Q: What other components are there in the UI? E.g. SASS compiler?

A: SASS->CSS, TypeScript->JS, NPM does that. Node implementation of SASS compiler.

 

Q: Next directions for JS? (Terry)

A: E.g. React. (Tim) First page rendering on the server really speeds up the user experience. (Art)

 

Q: Browser compatibility? In relation to server-side rendering. (Kim)

A: HTML and CSS

 

Q: Backward compatibility (e.g. input form declaration file) (Terry)

A: Migration or backward compatibility will be considered. To be decided, still just a POC. (Tim) New formats are an opportunity to solve some current issues. Important that we tested that we can use JSON to dynamically adapt submission form. Opens customizability options. (Andrea)