Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user John Kunze

Saved on

compared with

New Version 2

changes.mady.by.user John Kunze

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Attendees

Goals

Discussion items

ItemWhoNotes
Announcements

Any news items we should blog about? Any calls for papers, submission deadlines, upcoming meetings we should note? Please add to Calendar of events.



Standardization update

Spec transition planning

  • no conflict with URN namespace registration
  • no conflict with URI scheme registration (leave alone?)
  • for RFC, use of /.well-known will be required
    • heavy (each ARK) or
    • light (examples: resolver config, which seems typical (RFC6690 CoRE, RFC6415 host metadata, RFC8414 OAuth metadata, Keybase, W3C DID config, W3C Tabular data for web), 
  • register under W3C DID (Decentralized ID)?


Draft spec transition plan

  • Can we come up with strawperson times T0, T1, T2, ...?


Action items

  •