| Table of Contents |
|---|
MTOM Support on the WSDL Level
...
To be honest, I don't know. I would suggest the solution number 3. i.e. the router and new WSDLs, because it seems to me the best choice for possible future changes to Fedora's API. I had also some discussion with my friends which support this proposal.
Namespaces
suggestion:
prefix | old | new | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="2a14d14b-f50e-4664-a8b4-4d4000e3c236"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[ | fedora-types | [http://www.fedora.info/definitions/1/0/types/] | [ [http://fedora-commons.org/ | http://fedora-commons.org/]2011/07/definitions/types/ | http://www.fedora.info/2011/07/definitions/types/] | ]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro> |
<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="7f0a069c-0dab-4bdd-90cc-b42d60dca191"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[ | fedora-api | [http://www.fedora.info/definitions/1/0/api/] | [ [http://fedora-commons.org/ | http://fedora-commons.org/]www.fedora.info/2011/07/definitions/api/ | http://www.fedora.info |
...
/2011/07/definitions/api/] | ]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro> |