...
- CERIF2VIVO - Updates and next steps
- Descriptions for the infrastructure elements (equipment, service, facility) in CERIF
- is basically completed by Dragan, waiting for review
- Mapping precision
- Idea: Why not use the SKOS terms? CloseMatch, exactMatch, etc. https://www.w3.org/2009/08/skos-reference/skos.html
broadMatch? - https://www.w3.org/2009/08/skos-reference/skos.html#broadMatch - Terms of standard vocabularies https://github.com/EuroCRIS/CERIF-Vocabularies, https://github.com/EuroCRIS/CERIF-Vocabularies/blob/master/PersonEmploymentTypes.xml - how to match?
- Idea: Why not use the SKOS terms? CloseMatch, exactMatch, etc. https://www.w3.org/2009/08/skos-reference/skos.html
- Descriptions for the infrastructure elements (equipment, service, facility) in CERIF
- Wrap-up: CERIF2VIVO at CRIS conference - Dragan Ivanovic
- ~50 people in the session
- Q: Wouldn't it be easier to map to a refactored CERIF? A: Yes, but we can't wait. After the refactoring project is over, we have to consider a second run with the new scheme.
- Q: Case study to validate this mapping. A: Ideally implement a tool to ingest CERIF data in the future.
- FAIR Core for EOSC (Dragan Ivanovic?) - might be an option to put VIVO into the planned mapping service.