Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user Simeon Warner

Saved on

compared with

New Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Simeon Warner

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • https://github.com/LD4P/discovery/projects/2 for issues etc. 
  • Draft of a discovery plan: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zKYW7FQVVNvyd0XjjW0qWznX9PC3jbmOE6Kz_yygPjs/edit?usp=sharing
  • Research: how to go from knowledge graph to an index
  • BANG! (Bibliographic Aspects Newly GUI'd)
    • Jamboard link
    • Expect to include Works. Need to do something beyond what we already have live from the OCLC concordance data.
    • References/bibliography list (beginning)
    • 2022-03-04
      • ** Huda will add notes re: 10K sample

        • Sampling method: Using the first 10,000 hubs returned from the id.loc.gov search API. 

        • Overarching question: Can hubs provide relationships between catalog items?

        • Analysis: For every hub that has > 1 work, get ISBN groups.  For groups which have > 1 ISBN, record how many times querying the Cornell catalog with those ISBNs provides > 1 catalog result.

        • Results:

          • Total: 202 sets of ISBNs where each set > 1 ISBN, comprising of a total of 750 unique ISBNs total. 

          • Catalog matches:  26 ISBN groups which resulted in > 1 catalog result. These catalog matching ISBN groups comprise of 130 unique ISBNs.
      • Scripting hub-to-hub analysis, uni-directional. Almost done with process of getting ISBNs back... and will then query against catalog to allow us to say something like "out of 10K, there were ## ISBN groupings one can find using translation property of which ## yielded cataloging hit"
      • Since doing so many ajax queries, thinking about doing visualization
      • Need to go to LC Hub analysis – to look at LCCNs in addition to ISBNs
      • Hoping to be done with analysis in 2 weeks
      • Lots of presentation prep
      • To do: look at OCLC WorkId relationships to compare / identify groupings and results (in 2015 we had N number of clusters over the entire catalog).
    DAG Calls
    • 2022-03-04: PCC Sinopia Affinity Group call last week (overview of examples from both LD4P2 and LD4P3).  (Notes/Recording). Next week have CORE LD Interest Group & Catalog Form & Function interest group11
      • Had 200-300 people attend presentation on Wednesday, lots of questions (people fascinated by the infrastructure and our ability to make changes, FOLIO interest, role of cataloger in wikidata, fact vs contestable information, questions about mechanics)
      • Doing another presentation today (6th since January!), links on LD4 presentation page
      • BANG! work: Used 10,000 hub sample to look at relationships between hubs. Have added preliminary tables to data sources doc/report
        • Total: 110 ISBN sets related via hub to hub relationships, 22 result in >1 catalog matches (i.e. at least 2 catalog records related b/c two hubs are related)
          • 110 ISBN sets cover 381 ISBNs, 22 matching sets have 78 total ISBNs
          • By relationship: hasTranslation accounted for 92 of the total 110 ISBN sets, relatedTo accounted for 18
      • BANG! preliminary design-ish/data questions link
  • DAG Calls
    • 2022-03-11:
      • Archives discovery will be presented on 3/15LD4 Steering sent out questionnaire to Affinity Groups asking what support they can provide... Huda and Astrid will respond on behalf of DAG
  • Document started re: Comments, Questions and Suggestions offered during the myriad of presentations provided. Huda will add link here

...

...