Versions Compared

Old Version 5

changes.mady.by.user Bertrand Caron

Saved on

compared with

New Version 6

changes.mady.by.user John Kunze

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

Attendees

Goals

Clear up old action items; discuss changes to revised NAAN request form

Discussion items

ItemWhoNotes
announcements

BC: As duty curator, Maria Gould facilitates next month

calls for papers, submission deadlines, upcoming meetings: Calendar of events

JK: Interview posted with origin story of ARKs: https://saaers.wordpress.com/2021/09/14/ark-alliance-an-interview-with-john-kunze/

AC: Chloe has some historical stuff in her thesis
BM: maybe we should consider doing some post for World Digital Preservation Day, Nov 4

status review of previous action items


  •  John Kunze Bertrand Caron see if CCFr did indeed stop using their own NAANs
  •  John Kunze draft a policy statement in response to "we would like a different NAAN"
  •  John Kunze ask Outreach WG for feedback on institutional type field




BM: will share draft community update




BC: have not yet heard back from INIST


JK: type list received no comments from Outreach; assuming it will never be perfect and there's nothing depending on it yet, is it good enough for now?
BM: yes (seconded)

BC: we will try to set up a meeting with CCFr


JK: this is done, and curation checklist points to the policy document



Final feedback on proposed revised NAAN request form? Some new issues:

  • what about NP/FP/Other form ambiguity?
  • assignment policy: lower, upper, mixed case
  • resolution policy: map to: lower, upper
  • NAAN-local id in redirect rule

BC: NP/FP field gets an error when "other"; should we include a longer statement that goes into the registry? or leave it blank; it can feel
    uncomfortable for the curator to make the decision; or put "unknown"
JK: idea was that manual change by curator to "fix" is worth it given that we can use this to learn about people's notion of what their institution
AC: with the institutional types, we get more info in the registry
BC: yes
JK: should we change to the form processor so that "other" becomes a third value in the registry? eg, NP/FP/OTHER
BM: yes (seconded

JK: dormant ${nlid} (NAAN-local id) N2T feature surfaced in dev instance; allows OJS and Wordpress sites to come up without access to a webmaster that can install a rewrite rule (no matter how simple, it still needs a webmaster when there may be none available to do it)
BC: I like the ${nlid} idea and the case norm convention declaration and mapping idea; are there other ARK components that might be candidates for mapping during resolution?
JK: yes, there are several more dormant components (isolated in the decomposed ARK but not surfaced)

Action items