Versions Compared

Old Version 20

changes.mady.by.user Tim Donohue

Saved on

compared with

New Version 21

changes.mady.by.user Tim Donohue

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. How liberal or conservative do we want to be with allowing GSoC students to commit/merge "ready" code directly to Trunkin preparation for DSpace 1.7? This includes:
    1. How liberal/conservative do we want to be about giving students temporary commit rights to Trunk? Or, would we rather they merge their code together elsewhere (e.g. a common branch based on Trunk)?
    2. How liberal/conservative do we want to be about allowing for temporary "breakage" of trunk (which could happen as several projects attempt to merge code)?
  2. How much extra reviewing do we want of GSoC projects whose Mentors feel the code is "ready" for broader distribution/release in DSpace 1.7? If extra reviewing is warranted, how do we want to ensure this review is done in a timely manner (i.e. in time for DSpace 1.7, as necessary)?

...