...
Time | Item | Who | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
announcements | JK: first (mailchimp) newsletter failed to go out today; will investigate; suspect RSS feed failure | |||
upcoming meetings, calls for papers, submission deadlines
| Action: JK will inquire about PASIG deadline (since it wasn't available online) | |||
new draft spec: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-kunze-ark-26.txt
diffs between this spec and last spec discussed https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-kunze-ark-24.txt&url2=draft-kunze-ark-26.txt | RM: section 1.3 – is it true that "high quality access" is the central duty, and doesn't "high quality" risk being confused with "access to high-quality objects" | |||
Spec to do:
| JK: what's left before RFC submission; where do we continue our work -- using arks.org/labs? JK: need to catch up shoulder spec docs with shoulder FAQ | |||
Wikipedia ARK - is this as much Tech WG as Outreach WG? | JK: arks.org rollout brought wikipedia page to the fore; some of the problem is that the page has real overlap with spec (Tech WG) | Planning for feature support (optionality of "/", relaxed limits on NAANs and string lengths)
|
Action items
- Bertrand Caron will send ARK Alliance announcement to French forum
- John Kunze will inquire about PASIG deadlines
- All: please think about topics for the ARKA newsletter
- John Kunze Roxana Maurer come up with phrasing to clarify "high quality" vs "persistent" access (access not objects) as "central duty" of ARKs
- John Kunze Greg Janée clarify that multiple suffix normalization is for comparing arks rather than publishing them; see all comments in agenda notes
-
John Kunze review where Outreach got with wikipedia page