Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Issues / PRs for special attention (easy wins or "just one more +1!", and larger changes that need testers

IssuePR(s)CategoryNotes

Jira
serverDuraSpace JIRA
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverIdc815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5
keyDS-4440

PR#2693 (6.x)

PR#2692 (master)

Big changeAdding an 'Anonymize Statistics' feature to DSpace for GDPR compliance. Most of the discussion is on JIRA and on the master PR #2692. Consensus so far is that it works well, is definitely worth trying to get into 6.4, but could do with a bit more testing just to ensure no data loss to stats docs can occur in various conditions (see last master comment)

Jira
serverDuraSpace JIRA
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverIdc815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5
keyDS-2715

PR#2710

PR#2704 (5.x port)

Big changeAdding ORCIDv2 authority control support to JSPUI
This is a larger change that would benefit from more eyes and testers.

Jira
serverDuraSpace JIRA
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverIdc815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5
keyDS-3940

WIP (Kim)Big change

Support for SHERPA ROMeO API ends on April 14. Kim Shepherd is working on a PR to work with the new JSON APIv2. The data structure is quite different and the use of colours is not encouraged so much anymore, so there are a few questions around what to change, what to try and fit back into the old view/model, etc. (see JIRA convo)
This would be really good to get into 6.4 as all SHERPA lookups will start breaking after mid-April.

Jira
serverDuraSpace JIRA
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverIdc815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5
keyDS-3945

PR#2191
PR#2113
PR#1730 (merged)
PR#2464
Competing PRsA small bugfix, but there seem to be three PRs with similar solutions.
I think we prefer PR#2113 as it is a bit more robust, but...
I think PR#1730 might already fix the issue - needs testing. And PR#2464 is trying to fix a starts by issue and has a conflict with the changes merged from #1730.

In short: I think  this issue might either be fixed already in 6.x, or just needs PR#2113 to merge. Would appreciate a second opinion.


Issues merged for 6.4, waiting on something else (eg. porting to other another version, or documentation)

These issues are already fixed in 6.x branch but cannot be closed until they are forward-ported to master, or in the case of a security / critical bugfix, backported to 4.x and 5.x.

IssueNotesFurther work needed

Jira
serverDuraSpace JIRA
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverIdc815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5
keyDS-3849

Already merged for 6.x but master Travis CI build has Unit Test errors which need fixingport to master
(5.x PR also exists)

Jira
serverDuraSpace JIRA
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverIdc815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5
keyDS-3453

Already merged for 6.x but master PR#2121 has conflicts - very simple conflict involving whitespace in the imports, by the looks...port to master

Jira
serverDuraSpace JIRA
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverIdc815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5
keyDS-3658

Already merged for both fix versions but needs 6.x documentation (7.0 doc already added) just before 6.4 releasedocumentation (new feature)


TODO

Do we need the full "first review, second review, test, merge, port" checklist here? Depends how our workload looks. Certainly if there are PRs people are lobbying for, a list might help. (see 6.3 equiv checklist DSpace Release 6.3 Status)

...