...
Kickoff: clarify objectives and assign roles for (a) standardization and (b) NAAN procedures designers; spec authors articulate areas they think are problematic
Months 1-59: several rounds of review, feedback, and revision for (a) and (b), including public review via the arks-forum list; expect also interaction with the Outreach WG when they send requirements for (c) the “counting ARKs” project, for which design and prototyping then beginsMonth 6: ARK spec submitted to IETF; NAAN procedures are piloted; counting ARKs prototype is tested
- Months 710-12: feedback and review of '?info' inflection for returning human- and machine-readable metadata; ARK spec submitted to IETF
Months 13-15: recruit NAAN registry workers; deal with further refinements to procedures; ask Outreach Working Group to identify more orgs with ARKs to be counted; deal with inevitable spec feedback from the IETF
Month 11: production-ready procedures in place; production-ready ARK counting is in place
Months 16-18: further refinements to procedures; “counting ARKs” project design and prototyping then begins
- Months 19-20: counting ARKs prototype is tested
Month 21Month 12: updated WG objectives and deliverables for the coming year, with an accordingly updated overall AITO roadmap
...
Emmanuelle Bermès, BnF
Bertrand Caron BnF (AG Liaison, Co-chair for NAANs)
- Tom Creighton Family Search (Co-chair for Counting)
- Adrien Di Mascio Toucan Toco
- Karen Hanson Portico
- Greg Janée UC Santa Barbara
- Cillian Joy National University of Ireland, Galway
John Kunze California Digital Library (AG Liaison, Co-chair for Specification)
- Roxana Maurer National Library of Luxembourg
- Curtis Mirci University of Utah Sheila Morrissey Portico
- Mark Phillips University of North Texas
...