Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Architectural diagrams
    1. Top-level and Detailed, component-level
    2. APIs and services, specified
  2. Features spreadsheet
    1. Questions to answer:
      1. What will the product will do/support?
      2. What additional business value-add can the re-architecture offer?
      3. What are core? and why?
      4. Which features are in/out/optional?
      5. What audiences are specific features for?
      6. What are the logical groupings for features into modules?
      7. Will we offer multiple product distributions, analogous to VIVO/Vitro?
        1. Perhaps an "enterprise VIVO" vs. a "small-shop VIVO" vs. Vitro

Notes 

Audio recording

The word of Mike

  1. Statement of direction
    • Focus on 2019 actions
    • Common goal: Advancing scholarship
  2. VIVO community should be (will be) much larger... 1000s
    • Everyone should have a profile
    • ..with data that backs up the profile

Applications of VIVO

  1. Research Information management application
  2. Showcase profiles application
  3. Data production application
    • Producing value for institutions and the broader community

Actions for each team member

  1. See section "Pre-Fly-in actions"

More requirements

  1. Response time to render profiles
    • 20sec too much
  2. Cloud-ready?
  3. Need suggestion for graph-store
    • Need that suggestion/answer as a foundation
    • Actively maintained, production ready, multi-threaded, etc
  4. Speed of removing triples
    • Timeout on dumping large named graphs

Actions

  •  ...

Collection of existing architecture diagrams / resources

...