Regular Attendees
- Andrew
- Bill
- Chris
- Dan
- Jonathan
- Danny
General
- Call In To: Free Conference Call HD - DuraCloud Line
- - Indicates who will be taking minutes
Discussion Topic
Topic Discussion Leader Dev Meeting vs Strategy Meeting Bill Bill Upcoming meeting with Peter Muller and Tim Noke, UI Design Jonathan
Actions from last meeting
Last Weeks Actions:
Action Item |
Assignee |
Status |
|---|---|---|
Update your availability for the next 8 weeks in JIRA |
All |
|
Get Peter in the system when things are finalized this week |
Jonathan |
|
Add task covering in-CloudSync scheduling of tasks (2-day, unscheduled) and update existing task to note that initial 0.2 scheduling with be via cron |
Chris |
|
Status
- Jonathan
- Andrew
- Starting migration of DuraCloud Management Console from SimpleDB to LDAP this week
- No news on the Islandora instance
- Bill
- Created very simple webapp with an embedded jetty server, which can be deployed via an executable jar. See code on github
- Experimented with InstallBuilder. Created an installer for both the current DuraCloud Upload Tool (swing app) and the webapp noted above.
- Enterprise license for InstallBuilder (free for open source projects) has been obtained
- Chris
- Dan
- Danny
Minutes
- Dev vs Strategy Meeting
- Plan was to have the DfR meeting be primarily Dev going forward
- For the moment, just including some Strategy topics in the one meeting
- Dan: Still need to test the waters to see how much time we need for each
- Jonathan has asked Dan and Andrew to join the strategy meetings, schedule to be defined
- Dan: Would like to bring everyone up to speed on Data Conservancy and Tessella
- Upcoming meeting with Peter and Tim: Wed at noon
- Peter/Tim are on board, business arrangement has been made
- Peter has worked with Danny before
- Meeting is to make sure that there is shared understanding of the goals
- Jonathan: Touched based with Marine Lab (part of Univ of California system) and Columbia about getting access to researchers for DfR feedback
- Bill and Dan to look at the design docs more in depth prior to meeting
- Sync tool development
- Does the UI need to handle on-demand upload?
- Dan: Expectation that the GUI would be doing nothing but setup
- Bill: Thinking that the UI would collect info about the file system and present that to the UI for user to make selections
- Dan: Having a pathway to an institutional server (on a server in the IT shop)
- Dan: Example, if you have a 30 person shop, they likely share disk support and some applications: this works better as a webapp
- Bill: Running on a local machine, the interaction is different.
- Dan: Presuming the sync tool is running all the time, this needs to be the case for the sync tool to do constant updates
- Jonathan: Prefer that the web UI experience
- Andrew: Seems like we may wan to get a better idea of the requirements before making these choices
- Dan: Expecting that file system access to be handled via the server side
- Bill: Will be out the next two weeks, will have some UI design activities occuring in the meantime
- Plan: Get back to this issue when we have the full time in attendance and when some UI design work has been completed
- Does the UI need to handle on-demand upload?
Action Items
Action Item |
Assignee |
Status |
|---|
