You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Time/Place

Attendees

  • Andrew Woods
  • Esme Cowles
  • Chris Beer
  • Daniel Davis
  • Declan Fleming
  • A. Soroka
  • Benjamin Armintor
  • Zhiwu Xie
  • Neil Jefferies
  • Yinlin Chen

Agenda

  1. Clarify objectives of this group (reference: charter)
  2. Establish approach for addressing initial objectives
    1. Validate components and APIs
    2. Identify any questions or concerns about Fedora 4.0 architecture in the context of the project’s goals, objectives, and use cases
    3. Assess core vs. modular features
  3. Thought exercise: what would be the technical "risks" of releasing 4.0 Production *now*?

Minutes

Notes for Aug 14 Meeting:

 

Group - Help figure out if Fedora 4 (as developed) is meeting user requirements

 

Separate out REST API from remaining Fedora Implementation

Permits other implementations (different optimizations)

 

Clustered Multiple Node Case (Neil)

 

Performance

“Things are not working the way I like it to”

“Cannot meet a specific performance requirement”

“Can it support increased ingest performance”

 

Process for identifying the tasks. (Chris)

 

Review:

What are the aspects of the need to be reviewed:

 

API - REST, maybe core classes

Reviewing the architecture.

Performance (lay out scenarios cross by parts of architecture)

 

Use Cases (Scenarios)

Functional Requirements (features, capabilities)

Non-functional Requirements (ilities - like scalability, extensibility)

Functional Architecture

Technical Architecture (products and technology)

Implementation

 

Trace asynchronicity (against requirement a.k.a goals)

Trace preservation-related requirements and capabilities

    - Modeshape metadata and ramifications

 

Read or Write more important

 

Note - People are at different levels



Modeshape

Object persistence

Asynchronous model for persisting (more well known)

Less so for asynchronous check that functions were performed (possibly not part of repository)

Two asynchronous processes in play

 

Summary Actions:

 

Bring next week expectations and goals (not just performance but all qualities/functions) that improved upon Fedora 3, or were supported by Fedora 3 and still need to be supported by Fedora 4.

Actions

  • No labels