8:30–9:00 am

Breakfast

9:00–9:15 am

Welcome

Agenda, goals and outcomes, space, shared docs, other logistics.
Michelle Futornick (Stanford) 

9:15–9:45 am

Participant introductions

9:45–10:15 am

Setting the Stage

Overview of LD4P & LD4L-Labs efforts, background, context.
Dean Krafft (Cornell), Philip Schreur (Stanford) 

10:15–10:30 am

Break

10:30 am–12:45 pm

Topic Area #1: Ontology

Ontology development, maintenance, extensions, reuse, and related questions.

Session Intro and LD4P/LD4L-Labs Presentation:
Steven Folsom (Harvard), Jason Kovari (Cornell)

Lightning talks (Google drive folder containing the below)

• Gordon Dunsire (RDA): RDA and the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM)
• Rob Sanderson (Getty): The myth of inference
• Gloria Gonzalez (Zepheira): The Library Link Network
• Tim Cole (UIUC): What I learned (the hard way) from the W3C Web Annotation Working Group
• Antoine Isaac (Europeana): W3C Data on the Web Best Practices – Data Vocabularies

Notes from discussions (Google drive folder; each group discussed the below questions)

• Building links between BIBFRAME 2.0, LD4L/LD4P BF Extension, Domain Extensions & the rest of the LOD world
• Implications of having multiple ontologies in library world.

12:55–1:55 pm

Lunch

Lunch buffet in meeting space.

2:00–5:00 pm

with break

Topic Area #2: Workflows, Procedures & Production

What linked data means for our existing procedures; moving linked data into production.

Session Intro: Josh Greben and Philip Schreur (Stanford)

LD4P/LD4L-Labs Presentation:
Arcadia Falcone (Stanford): Technical Services Workflow Pipeline

Lightning talks (Google drive folder containing the below)

• Osma Suominen (Nat'l Lib of Finland): From MARC to Schema.org – via BIBFRAME!
• Carl Stahmer (UC Davis): UC Davis Linked Data Implementation
• Arwen Hutt (UCSD): Non-MARC workflows in LOD
• John Ockerbloom (Penn): Keeping sharp focus in catalog and authority work
• Julie Hardesty (Indiana U): Hydra-focused workflows using RDF
• Amber Billey (Columbia): Identity Management see (also) Authority Control

Notes from discussions (Google drive folder containing the below)

• Cooperative metadata management in an open, linked-data environment
• Living with both MARC and RDF data in an open, linked-data environment
• Managing authoritative data in an open, linked-data environment
• Service-level access to descriptive metadata and authoritative data in an open, linked-data environment
• Interfaces required for managing workflows in an open, linked-data environment

4:30–5:00 pm

Wrap-Up

5:30–7:00 pm

Reception

Green Library

8:30–9:00 am

Breakfast

9:00–9:15 am

Introduction

9:15–Noon

Topic Area #3: Tooling and Services

Map existing tool landscape and identify tool gaps. Explore how tools fit together in a continuous workflow.

Session Intro: Simeon Warner (Cornell)

LD4P/LD4L-Labs Presentations (Google drive folder containing the below)

• Tom Cramer (Stanford): Linked Data Tooling: Maps and Gaps
• Rebecca Younes (Cornell): LD4L-Labs Converter
• Josh Greben (Stanford): Testing Suite and Validation Work
• Kirk Hess (Lib of Congress): LC BIBFRAME Tools: Converter and Editors
• Huda Khan (Cornell): VitroLib: Developing a linked data editor for catalogers
  
• Dave Eichmann (U of Iowa): Reconciliation and visualization

Lightning talks (Google drive folder containing the below)

• Shlomo Sanders (ExLibris): A vendor's perspective
• Sebastian Hammer (IndexData): BIBFRAME in FOLIO
• Niklas Lindström (Nat'l Lib of Sweden): Vocabulary-driven cataloging at the National Library of Sweden
• Andrew Pace (OCLC): Metadata Refinery overview
• John Graybeal (Stanford): CEDAR demo
• Emmanuelle Bermes (BnF): Linked data in production since 2010; lessons learnt

10:20–10:50 am

Break

10:50 am–Noon

Topic Area #3 cont.

Notes from discussions (Google drive folder containing the below)

• What is current best in class for tools that meet needs? (And why aren’t we all just using them?) – facilitator: Dave Eichmann
• What are the biggest and most pressing gaps? – facilitator: Amber Billey
• How can we organize ourselves to get better and more tools? Are some things better provided as (hosted) services rather than (local) instances of tools? – facilitator: Jason Kovari
• What tools & services for linked data can we use that don’t come from cultural heritage organizations? – facilitator: Christina Harlow
• All of the above

Noon–1:00 pm

Lunch

Lunch buffet in meeting space.

1:00–3:15 pm

Topic Area #4: Community Engagement and Adoption

Engagement of user communities. How to encourage adoption of standards, tools, services, infrastructure.

LD4P/LD4L-Labs intro: Michelle Futornick (Stanford), Dean Krafft (Cornell)

Lightning talks (Google drive folder containing the below)

• Neil Jefferies (Oxford): Distributed authorities

• Leif Andresen (Royal Danish Library): Next big steps for cataloging in Denmark and Europe
  

• Caitlin Tillman (U of Toronto): Linked data in Canada
• Tom Baker (DCMI): DCMI and the vocabulary ecosystem
• Sally McCallum (Lib of Congress): LC Feedback Loops
• Jackie Shieh (GWU): PCC Task Group on URIs in MARC: Outreach Efforts
• Steven Folsom (Harvard): Keeping the Exciting in "vague but exciting"

Notes from discussions (Google drive folder containing the below)

• Discussion questions identified as a group
  • Is lack of a “linked data business case” hindering adoption?
  • How do existing bodies fit into this work? What additional collaborations should LD4P/LD4L-Labs/library community pursue?
    
  • How can vendors engage more broadly with rest of community?
    
  • Who manages our data, URIs, ontologies, and other resources?
  • What do successful training models look like?
    

3:15–3:30 pm

Break

3:30–4:30 pm

Next Steps

Tom Cramer and Philip Schreur (Stanford)

• Discussion notes
• Answers to the question: If we (linked open data community) could do 2 things to increase community engagement and traction around linked data, what might they be?

4:30–5:00 pm

Conclusion