The notes below reflect a summary of the March 13 open forum discussion answer the proposed questions.

EDITING IN PROCESS

Tues. March 13, morning sessions

James Hilton kick-off

• It is not a crisis or cliff pushing this meeting agenda. It's an opportunity to come together and "Move the needle" towards a future that meets all of our needs.  
• We are at a pivital moment that hangs on (digital) preservation. 
• A 2011 Nobel Prize was awarded for those who noticed that the universe is expanding faster and faster; it is not static. In the far future galaxies that we now see will rush away so fast that we won't be visible anymore. The blackness will infer that nothing else ever existed in the universe except that matter which is immediately in front of and surrounding humans in that distant future. It is our responsibility to ensure that evidence of stars, galaxies and solar systems inform the far future.
• We have an emerging digital preservation stack (see JH slides).
• Where do all these parts and pieces fit together other than around the 20K price tag for support of each?
• No guarantee that any of these layers feed into the rest of the stack (bleed between the layers); institutions may utilize parts and pieces of the stack:
  
  • Access repositories
  • Preservation repositories
  • DPN backbone
  • Code (that includes DSpace and Fedora)
• What do I get for my 20K annual fee? 
  
  • It is an investment in collective/shared capabilities; it's more like thinking about FTEs because that's where you get "capability"

Discussion

• Rob Catalano--stack of services is not yet clearly defined; still in R&D phases
• We need to understand the ecosystem that DuraSpace lives in
• Dean Krafft--How do I decide which to invest in?
  
  • If we fail to invest as a community we will suffer the tragedy of the Commons
  • No reason not to be putting the investment into all the layers but not everyone has to invest
  • We need to get the right mix/compliments among efforts on the stack; what is the most effective investment
  • The stack helps us winnow/select content for preservation

JH Short overview of Fedora past

Institutions and foundations invested heavily in DSpace and Fedora and it was good. Millions of dollars were spent. Institutions and foundations said they were done. "You must be self-sustaining". There was no spigot with millions of dollars coming out of it. How do we make the organization self-sustaining was a DuraSpace board question. How to sustain community open source projects is a community issue. Revenue was diversified over a number of years with the sponsorship program and grants along with service revenue. This is the moment to take up the question sustainability for open source projects.

Michele and Jonathan Myths and Debunks (see slides)

• "Our Mission is not about software; we are committed to our digital future." MK
• We are here today because we need to work with you and creating sustainable, new investment strategies to reinvigorate DSpace and Fedora developmen
• Fedora needs about a half million dollars per year to move forward toward rapid, cohesive development
• "Each of you owns the Fedora and DSpace code to the degree in which you participate and utilize the open source software. You all own Fedora and DSpace."  JJM
• How does VIVO fit in? (Dean Krafft)
  • VIVO has moved from being a grant-supported project into developing a model for sustainability.
  • Large grant from NIH
  • More than 100 institutions piloting VIVO software
  • Signed on as a DuraSpace incubated project because:
    
    • Wanted independent biz administration
    • Wanted help with infrastructure (wiki, code repository)
    • Looking for a model for sponsorship and project support
    • There will be a tech coordinator/lead who will be hired through DuraSpace
  • "VIVO fits into the DuraSpace mission because research institutions like Cornell need to know WHAT the university scholarly output is--that's the content that VIVO pulls together."

What are the interrelationships among our efforts?

Difference between stewardship and ownership is that the ds board and org are charged with the fiduciary reap of keeping the org going; communities have to "own" the projects

"Dude, you own the software."

How is governance going to come out of this somewhat new perspective (for this group)?

Is some of the ambition of the meeting about moving projects into services column?

Not necessarily. We have done the low-hanging fruit service (DSpaceDirect). We are not in a crisis and are not abandoning DSpace or Fedora--have enough $ for immediate future. Clarifying roles of community and DuraSpace

Less  about sustainability and more about momentum

We cannot continue to find the gap in development costs

Fedora is a piece of code; FedoraCloud is a service

VIVO sponsorship level is higher than DSpace or Fedora Levels; expectations is that the founding sponsors will set the strategic direction for VIVO; looking into a service offering that will help with VIVO sustainability

Products not projects?? Not backed up with sales of the product. this is how people know how they are doing and what they are doing.

How many people believed some or all of these myths (early slide) before this presentation. If people leave understanding this slide it will be a success. This meeting is really about the future of Fedora and DSpace.

Engaging the other 93% of repository users in new ways?? Can it be done either financially or with cont in kind?

Have to find ways for folks outside of ARL to contribute, perhaps non-code, testing, usability perhaps. Not able to contribute at the 2-FTE level

Lifecycle for a stack of software is 5-10 years. This is a different timing issue that general preservation policy and scholarship has already gone digital. We are in humanities in the digital age.

Tyler (get slides)

VT participation $122,904 total = 1.4 FTE

ARL library; 17.2M dollars annually

For this annual investment we get many benefits

Where do the larger increments of dollars that it will cost to participate in DPN beyond 20K--of course there are ongoing costs for having staff participate; leverage the scarce developer resources we have with those of other shops

When talking digital preservation the language is often not understandable by those people who fund preservation efforts

Enough digital content that u administrators value that we can start having the DPN conversation

Does DPN need DuraSpace?

Code layer at the bottom is necessary to manage your digital content in a way that is visible and meaningful for scholars and scholarship. We need DSpace and Fedora to do this.

Without the stack there ain't no DPN; DPN needs repositories. Is the value proposition worth it to the DSpace and Fedora communities

Does Tyler have an idea of how much that $$ would buy without the community efforts and projects. The way it works for Virginia Tech is idiosyncratic and involves a lot of "pushing around"

Sayeed--Need to put a timeframe around this. There is an urgency. Data is being destroyed right now. It is being destroyed now--what was wrong with those people (us).

there is not any chance to preserve on some materials that are so fragile they are deteriorating. 

Invisible to Visible--Ann Wolpert

Scientific integrity has widespread support

In australia there are 2 funding agencies and research data must be accessible; U New South Wales; Fedora is critical to this effort

What we pay for software to access collections is high--has 7 people working on Fedora; Tyler's kind of arguments can help illustrate to people why this is important.

What have you heard?

• makes me want to contribute more back  (need to do a little clean up) instead of working on something else (Sid from Rice)
• we knew this day was coming – funded thru grants, at some point something needs to change – this is it – the point where we have to step up a little bit
• distribute slides: want numbers – Tyler Walters slides 1.4 FTE – spending so little money in this area, that we need more allocated – I want to double what we spend
• grant $s get whacked by research office – 50% taken off – can’t some of that money help the projects?
• need to make the case that we aren’t just books and stacks
• terminology does matter – project/product/program – maybe program is better – program that spins off projects
• DuraSpace hasn’t broght some of these concerns sooner – need to know what the challnges are we Fedora
• Fedora needs to be backward compatable
• really keen to do open source except when it gets hard
• what is the governance model – how do we make it better
• funding modeles and ROI – we are the choir, we are making the case at our institutions
• governanace/stakeholder engagement – project level and DuraSpace, moving from appointed to elected boards – have some people involved besides just technical
• more communication for roadmapping - 
• F & D community can’t sit still
• heard fin position
• surpised that projects are in the red and that it isn’t a problem
• how do we get general presevation problem funded – long term access might be a better way to think about it – current $s vs endowment – and other funding for the whole stack
• both projects are mature, dev is difuse, might not be a good dvelopmetn strategy – look at other models – consolidating resources to make pushes (like Kuali) –
• governance – how to dev roapmap
• developing a common pitch for provost

What do you have concerns about?

• we were told we are not in crisis, but are we really in crisis?
• urgency – physical backlog of books vs. a digital backlog – digital resources are vulernable
• many people on campus don’t agree that we need an IR
• 70% or organizations resources are dedicated on physical objects
• only 10% of our adopter community that are sponsoring – needs to be higher
• would be good to have an easy way to get from DSpace to Fedora – maybe that is a priority of the community to work on
• how do we make sure non-sponsors are included in community
• multiple 20K sponsorship needs
• deficiets of D & F are a concern, can they be resolved
• need to support community at large, risk factors on relying on just one person
• need more ULs here – need to broaden the base of supporters
• shocked at how low sponsorship rate is – thought it was higher
• donations to broad community effort  - DuraSpace – how does contributions benefit the platforms
• excitement around FF project – not an equivelent for DSpace – possible neglect
• same/usual suspects that contribute – fatigue – need to expand contributions (financial and inkind) by other inst.

What has inspired you?

• urgency of the digital dark age
• good to know DuraSpace not in crisis
• we have to take ownership and DuraSpace seems to be the place to take ownership
• how Lyrasis position’s itself as a svc – maybe DuraSpace would posistion itelf that way
• by the financial position of DuraSpace
• excelleration of the createion of dig data – is there a space to consider policy workflow layers so we don’t all re-create
• openess and transparency
• ROI discussion from Tyler
• Tyler – how much actual $ spent – suggests there is a lot of pontential upside – but how do we get there
• James stack – helped
• we are not dealing with digital humanities we are dealing with humanities that are digital

What unanswered questions do you have?

• Fedora – curiousity about additional investment – how much funding is needed – long term, short term, etc.
• what governance model would be effective
• need governance roadmap going forward
• more roadmap discussions
• more ways to particpate
• can we expand community of users
• can we expand ways projects use
• can we identify all who use Fedora
• more sharing of knowledge and expertise
• can we have a slide deck about meta issues for F & D
• making the invisiable visable
• do we take a bundled approach
• should Duraspace reach out to other orgs
• what are the other governance models used
• how does this relate to digital preservation /better communicate value prop of how DuraSpace fits into this larger value proposition
• share value propsition for selling to leadership
• we need a louder roadmap about going forward